Image for current challenge (NOT)Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Image for current challenge (NOT)This was the image that I wanted to enter in the image challenge....but it was taken with a little P&S (canon A75). Image was taken on holidays in Qld. Only increase saturation/USM/buring...
Nice shot.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
I think it fits the diff perspective theme....the camera was placed at my feet to take te pic of my wife and kiddies, the seagol just flew by...
The good thing about the themes is the old Tropfest rule applies to them:
Interpret them any way you want. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Brilliant, one of those moments to cherish.
Personally i would cut the seagull out and put it slightly more to the left to balance the shot a bit more. Great timing though, well done. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Hi Phillip,
Looks good Agree with Max...shadow needs to be fixed. The original was captured as it is...a luck shoot
Phillip - you could try it without any shadow as well.
The reasoning - in the orginal shot the shadow was exactly where it should be but by moving the bird the shadow would now be out of frame according to the Law of Physics Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
laws were meant to be broken I still love the original photo anyway. It's something that happens from time to time. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|