A place for us to talk about Nikon related camera gear.
Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.
by Bob G on Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:34 am
Yes we're getting very close - that is, me and my new kit.
Went for a walk down the strip tonight to try auto ISO ( set a ceiling ISO with auto, a fixed aperture and a minimum floor shutter speed )
Here are some results:-
Semos Morrocan Restaurant - f2.8 : 1/60s : ISO2500 : 58mm
Gelatisimo - f2.8 : 1/250s : ISO800 : 24mm
Klingers Menswear - f2.8 : 1/60s : ISO2800 : 24mm
Zink Bar - f2.8 : 1/30s : ISO6400 : 56mm

Bob
"Wake up and smell the pixels!"
-

Bob G
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 1:52 am
- Location: Mooloolaba, Sunshine Coast, Qld.
-
by big pix on Sun Dec 16, 2007 10:21 am
........ are you sleeping with it yet....... as it seems that you do not go out alone.......
control the whites and you have it nailed.......
Cheers ....bp.... Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
-

big pix
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4513
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.
by Killakoala on Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:48 pm
I like the idea of a truly usable auto ISO. That feature will be fantastic for sports photographs and the like.
Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
-

Killakoala
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Southland NZ
-
by Glen on Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:44 pm
Nice examples Bob of the high ISP capabilities of the D3. Pleased you got it this side of Christmas
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by Alpha_7 on Sun Dec 16, 2007 5:38 pm
What are you thoughts on the 24-70 ??? I'm still deciding between the 28 and 24 to 70. So the more feedback the better! I'd love a D3 too, but maybe next year.
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by Bob G on Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:39 pm
Craig,
I sold - 10.5 fiseye, 12-24 dx, 17-35, and 28-70 (all nikon)
I bought - 14-24 and 24-70 to replace above for the D3
The 17-35 and 28-70 were outstanding lenses but in my opinion, and others more qualified, the newer lenses are at another level.
The 24-70 is a G Type lens so if that doesn't bother you I'd go the 24-70 - I think it's cheaper anyway
Bob G
Bob
"Wake up and smell the pixels!"
-

Bob G
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 1:52 am
- Location: Mooloolaba, Sunshine Coast, Qld.
-
by Alpha_7 on Sun Dec 16, 2007 10:10 pm
So you don't have any qualms about the build quality of the 24-70 (on all accounts the glass is great, but "it looks cheaper") I've yet to hold one so I don't know.
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by Bob G on Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:57 pm
Because it's a G lens it is not as bulky - but it's not like a cheap plastic lens - definately a pro lens
Bob
"Wake up and smell the pixels!"
-

Bob G
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 1:52 am
- Location: Mooloolaba, Sunshine Coast, Qld.
-
by Oneputt on Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:15 am
Bobs 24-70 is a lot lighter and less bulky than my 28-70, and it does have the convex front lens which will call for you to be very careful. From a very short play with it though it is certainly sharp, as of course is the beast.
-

Oneputt
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3174
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
- Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.
-
by methd on Mon Dec 17, 2007 6:44 pm
The lens is -tack- sharp, one just needs to know how to use it
I've been using shots straight out of the camera without any sharpening added. Here's an example (sorry for the hijack!).. no sharpening applied at all (and none in camera either).

Last edited by methd on Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:12 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-

methd
- Member
-
- Posts: 483
- Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:12 pm
- Location: Melbourne, VIC.
by Bob G on Mon Dec 17, 2007 6:56 pm
MethD
Nice shot and sharp as a tack. It is an exceptional zoom with the quality of a good prime lens
This shot was taken at 3200 iso and whilst it has a narrow DOF and was focused on the bridge of his nose and toward the right eye it does show the sharpness in his moustache.

Bob
"Wake up and smell the pixels!"
-

Bob G
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 1:52 am
- Location: Mooloolaba, Sunshine Coast, Qld.
-
by Geoff on Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:30 pm
Would u guys PLEASE stop it? 
-

Geoff
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
- Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.
-
by ATJ on Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:09 pm
It is very impressive but I'm happy with my new toy.
-

ATJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
- Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
-
Return to Nikon
|