Split Point Lighthouse - Aireys InletModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Split Point Lighthouse - Aireys InletMy contribution for tonight is this one of the lighthouse at Aireys Inlet Vic.
I'm still waiting to get a decent morning light shot of this, but this shot in the mid - afternoon will have to do for now. I copped a gumboot full of water taking this shot. Should have stood on the bigger rock! D 70 was never in any danger though.....I think? ISO 200 18mm frame 1/40th f/10 DX kit lens. Saturation upped somewhat in PS. I also used unsharp mask a tad - don't have the RAW file left so can't be sure on that. Does this exposure look fake? It doesn't convince me - though I know for sure it's real. Cheers, Matty B Shoot early - Shoot often
Matty B (exactly the same name as me by the way)
I like this shot although looking at it, it seems like you've used the shadow/highlight adjustment in PS to bring the foreground rocks up. If it's real as you say then its amazing. It looks somewhat surreal. I really like the aspect though. Nice one. matt
Hmm. Me and my mates took photos at another lighthouse past lorne. You have to turn off and go through some sort of national park.
edit. looks like it was cape otway edit. or maybe it was aireys inlet.....the latest photo I've seen has a house next to the lighthouse.....the one we went to had a house
Kipper, this is Split Point Lighthouse at Aireys Inlet.
Glen and rockstar, I take your point re- unreal appearance. I know how to use the shadow highlight tool in Ps but I'm dead sure I didn't use it on this exposure. The reason I asked about it's appearance is that I seem to take a lot of shots like this - and only with the DX 18 - 70mm lens at wide open angles. I'm using Adobe RGB in camera and in PS but any of the other profiles give the same "un-real" effect. I also note that it's often with blue in the sky that this happens. It never happens with the sun directly over my shoulder which caused me to comment on waiting for a morning light shot which would do exactly that. Thanks for your opinions and pointers. Shoot early - Shoot often
Its a spot on exposure though. The highlights and shadows seem nice and equal so that there isnt too much dark or burnt out areas.
It doesn't look real for that reason I think because you expect the cliff face to be darker. But other than that, its nicely done "in camera". Matt
Matty I like it. It's perfect for a jigsaw puzzle!
The unreal-ness is possible due to the fact that you've fixed up the image to have as little contrast as possible. Little difference in light levels, despite what our eyes usually tells us what to expect in scenes like this in terms of dynamic range. You've done very well to compress the dynamic range of the scene, but at the expense of maximising the 'tails' of your image histogram.
See that's just it rockstar,
One expects a camera (properly set for the exposure) to re-produce an accurate reproduction image of what the eye sees. Maybe I'm fundamentally wrong there? Well, damn it, I'm sure the cliffs were a bit darker - not a great deal but not nearly as vivid as they appear this time. Shots facing the other direction on the same shoot are dead set realistic. I hope the sensor is working as it should? Must be -because this unreal phenomenon is quite random yet occurs often enogh for even me to question my own exposures. Maybe my eyes need testing, after all, I'm the only one in my family (out of 50 who has no req. for glasses of some sort? Cheers, Matty B Shoot early - Shoot often
Matty, besides what has been said so far, I don't think that the light blue frame helps you. Maybe try a black one which will contrast more with the actual photo.
__________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|