Great Ocean Road Series - 50th Anniversary

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Great Ocean Road Series - 50th Anniversary

Postby whoalse on Thu Jan 03, 2008 10:39 am

These were taken over the last weekend of 2007. Would love to have your inputs. Thanks

Thunder Cave - from lower view
Image

Thunder Cave - from higher view
Image

12 Apostles
Image

Happy New Year to all
User avatar
whoalse
Member
 
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: Richmond, VIC

Postby ozimax on Thu Jan 03, 2008 10:54 am

I think the 2nd is the best of the 3, seems like you had a good trip.

Ozi[/i]
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby johnd on Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:03 am

I like the cliff detail in the LHS of the 1st and the RHS of the 2nd.

I understand you took the shots from different places, but have you tried stitching the shots together to make a panorama shot. The perspective might be too different between the shots for this to work, but it's worth a try. Also, with the pano, the cave mouth might end up being too central.

If I had to choose one, I'd go for the 2nd. Only thing I don't like so much is the colour of the clouds. maybe take some blue out and desaturate them a bit.

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Travy on Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:43 am

Great images!

i like the 1st and 3rd :)
User avatar
Travy
Member
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:44 am
Location: Irymple, Vic

Postby whoalse on Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:52 pm

Thanks, folks, for your kind comments and advice.

will look into it when i'm back home. Can't wait leaving for home though as still in a holiday mood!

it was a good trip down with a close friend of mine who visited me.

johnd, what's LHS and RHS? I'm a noob with these acronyms! would also love to do pano but not sure which program is the best (yet simple to use). any recommendations?

thanks again
User avatar
whoalse
Member
 
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: Richmond, VIC

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:05 pm

LHS RHS == Left hand side and Right hand Side

And my preference is for the first one. Nicely done.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby johnd on Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:56 pm

whoalse wrote:johnd, what's LHS and RHS? I'm a noob with these acronyms! would also love to do pano but not sure which program is the best (yet simple to use). any recommendations?

thanks again


What Craig said.
For panoramas, I use Panorama Factory. From memory I think it costs about $70 or $80 or thereabouts. You can get a free trial of it as a download. Just google panorama factory. Only trouble with the free trial is it puts a Panorama Factory logo right in the middle of your panorama. Good enough though to see if you like the software. If you decide to buy, you pay your money and they email you the codes to unlock the software and get rid of the logo.

You can also put together panoramas using Photoshop etc, but I have found Panorama Factory pretty easy to use and produces great results.

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby DStrom on Thu Jan 03, 2008 5:09 pm

Try Hugin,

its free (though it can be harder to set up) and I have had much better results than from Panorama Factory ...

http://hugin.sourceforge.net/
User avatar
DStrom
Member
 
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 1:38 pm
Location: Erskineville, Sydney - Nikon D300 / D70

Postby adam on Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:55 pm

For me, I like the third one best :) The first seems to lack a little in contrast and sharpness on the upper right rocks (upper centre in the second), but I'm guessing that this is just the rocks, and a small image (which I shouldn't peep so close).

I think that some sense of scale could be provided by inclusion of a person or 'standard sized tree', but not necessary. Just what I would have liked to see, particularly as I'm wondering whether the green at the top is just grass, shrubs or actually big trees dwarved by the large size of the rocks.

Reminds me of some photographs a friend Angeline showed on smugmug yesterday :lol:
---
Equipment: camera body, wide lens, standard lens, telephoto lens, flash
Wish list: skill
User avatar
adam
Senior Member
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:27 pm
Location: New Caledonia

Postby whoalse on Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:13 pm

Thanks heaps, guys...

Adam, Angeline (or i am used to her other name) is a closed fren of mine. Small world eh........ :P
User avatar
whoalse
Member
 
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: Richmond, VIC


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques