I wanted to try something different...

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

I wanted to try something different...

Postby Bindii on Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:41 am

with my pelican shots... the background was terrible (sunnylass will tell ya).. so I thought.. why not try and incorporate it in the shot instead of trying to hide it...

I did a few of the more normal ones (clear background) also but do you think that the others work?..

:)

Image

Image

Image

Image
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list... ;)
User avatar
Bindii
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: Ormeau Hills Queensland

Postby iposiniditos on Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:53 am

yes.... the #1 and #2 are sharp and beautiful.
1st one is a great capture.
Very well done!

As for your question, yes they work :D
Theodoros Chliapas
www.tchliapas.com

Arf she said...
User avatar
iposiniditos
Senior Member
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 5:33 am
Location: Kozani, Greece

Postby sirhc55 on Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:54 am

#1 is an amazing shot in that the humanoids are taking absolutely no interest in the bloody great birdie that could dump an amazing amount of poo on them, judging by its size :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby NeoN on Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:30 am

sirhc55 wrote:#1 is an amazing shot in that the humanoids are taking absolutely no interest in the bloody great birdie that could dump an amazing amount of poo on them, judging by its size :D


Typical of you Chris,but really as Theo said, they are Nicely done,and blend very well,good job Bindii :D
Cheers NeoN
http://www.redbubble.com/people/neophytos
User avatar
NeoN
Member
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 3:18 pm
Location: Paphos - Cyprus

Postby phillipb on Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:30 am

They definitely work for me.
The last two are good, but you sort of look at them, think to yourself "They're nice shots" and move on.
The first two however, you look at the bird, then your eye goes around taking in the rest of the photo, then you come back to the bird again. At least that's what it does to me.
Well done Bindii
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby Handlebars on Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:36 am

Wow! love them all again!
C&C more than welcome!
Canon 300d...(hopefully not for too long though)
http://www.redbubble.com/people/HandleBars
User avatar
Handlebars
Member
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 3:34 am
Location: Wattle Grove, Perth

Postby PiroStitch on Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:22 pm

love the DOF in the 2nd one! Great stuff Bindii!
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby Travy on Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:30 pm

phillipb wrote:They definitely work for me.
The last two are good, but you sort of look at them, think to yourself "They're nice shots" and move on.
The first two however, you look at the bird, then your eye goes around taking in the rest of the photo, then you come back to the bird again. At least that's what it does to me.
Well done Bindii


I agree with you there :)

They are all great shots though 8)
User avatar
Travy
Member
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:44 am
Location: Irymple, Vic

Postby dawesy on Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:33 pm

I think #1 is a cracker. The background gives context and adds to the image, yet the Pelican is mostly on the plain wall so it still remains seperated from an essentially 'busy' background. I think you achieved exactly what you set out for with that one!

I also like #3, always loved watching pelicans land when we had a house by the lake as a kid!
dawesy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: Roseville, Sydney

Postby Mal on Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:00 pm

phillipb wrote:They definitely work for me.
The last two are good, but you sort of look at them, think to yourself "They're nice shots" and move on.
The first two however, you look at the bird, then your eye goes around taking in the rest of the photo, then you come back to the bird again. At least that's what it does to me.
Well done Bindii


I agree the first two work for me and the other ones are ho um.....
Mal
I've got a camera, it's black. I've got some lens, they are black as well.
User avatar
Mal
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:18 pm
Location: Berowra, NSW.

Postby BullcreekBob on Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:15 pm

Have you though of more blurr for the bg in #1 and #2?

All good shots though. I imagine it won't be long before we see you advertising all your Canon gear for sale? You are certainly making the S5 sing.
User avatar
BullcreekBob
Member
 
Posts: 444
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:57 pm
Location: Manning - an inner southern suburb of Perth, WA

Postby johnd on Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:20 pm

Sue, these are crackers. Just fantastic.
Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Big Red on Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:23 pm

great shots with the different perspective 8)
User avatar
Big Red
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2520
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Jacobs Well Qld ... mossie capital of the world

Postby sunnylass on Mon Jan 07, 2008 3:29 pm

Wow, these are stunning! All I can say is thank goodness there is no audio commentary to go with this.


Oh oh, put up the one of the windscreen :lol:
Dear Santa ........ good is NOT Bindii.
User avatar
sunnylass
Member
 
Posts: 302
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 6:21 pm
Location: Ipswich, Qld

Postby matt-chops on Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:17 pm

I have to say I'm a big fan of #4. IMO having the head and body perfectly sharp and the wings and feet ever so slightly blurred provides a perfect balance between still life and motion. It seems to breath just enough life into the photo. Nice work. :D
Matt

Canon 5DmkII + Grip | Canon 400D + Grip | 17-40 f/4 L USM | 24-105 f/4 L IS USM | 70-200 f/2.8 L IS USM | 2 x 580 EX II | Manfrotto Stabilizing Stuff
User avatar
matt-chops
Member
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 8:25 pm
Location: Southside, Brisbane

Postby blacknstormy on Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:30 pm

I love #1 - fantastic !!!!!!
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby Bindii on Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:37 pm

sunnylass wrote:Oh oh, put up the one of the windscreen :lol:


Lol... you mean the 'where not to park your car ones?'... :P

Image

Image
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list... ;)
User avatar
Bindii
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: Ormeau Hills Queensland

Postby drifter on Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:43 pm

The birds may have misinterpreted PP ok on your images.....


Great shots btw .The first one works well as an opposite to what the norm would be.
Tony

Atheism is a non-prophet organisation.
User avatar
drifter
Member
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:37 pm
Location: Croydon -Sydney

Postby Mj on Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:34 pm

Sue... certainly the shots with something other than straight water etc are far more interesting... some of these are just plain good fun!!! A bird in the water is... well... yawn :roll:

However... as you've put these up for critique... your PP treatment of the birds is somewhat over sharpened. Might I suggest backing off a tad on the sharpening ??? Also the top right pelican in the last pic seems to have acquired some chroma (unless it's head really is purple?).

Apologies for being a killjoy :twisted:

Michael.
Photography is not a crime, but perhaps my abuse of artistic license is?
User avatar
Mj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 3:37 pm
Location: Breakfast Point, Sydney {Australia}

Postby Bindii on Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:51 pm

Mj wrote:Sue... certainly the shots with something other than straight water etc are far more interesting... some of these are just plain good fun!!! A bird in the water is... well... yawn :roll:

However... as you've put these up for critique... your PP treatment of the birds is somewhat over sharpened. Might I suggest backing off a tad on the sharpening ??? Also the top right pelican in the last pic seems to have acquired some chroma (unless it's head really is purple?).

Apologies for being a killjoy :twisted:

Michael.


No crit away.. all is good.. :)

Point taken on the sharpening.. I didn't sharpen in the original proccessing only once I resized and more than likely I forgot to reduce the opacity of it once done..

funny that you mentioned the chroma.. (lost on the top right pelican thing though as there is only one pelican in the last pic)..cause when I viewed these pics on my work monitor today the chroma was terrible... but I can't see it at all on this monitor at home.. I'd be interested to hear if anyone else can see it (maybe my montior needs calibrating/trashing etc??)..

thanks for the crit.. much appreciated.. :)
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list... ;)
User avatar
Bindii
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: Ormeau Hills Queensland

Postby Mj on Mon Jan 07, 2008 11:05 pm

Was referring to the one labelled 'where not to park your car ones?'... with the second shot of the cars below.... definitely four pelicans in that shot (at least that what I hope I'm seeing)... none of the others appear to have any appreciable chroma that I noticed. The chroma displayed is pretty much classic... lotsa contrast with the white feathered bird against a bright sky.
Photography is not a crime, but perhaps my abuse of artistic license is?
User avatar
Mj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 3:37 pm
Location: Breakfast Point, Sydney {Australia}

Postby Bindii on Mon Jan 07, 2008 11:08 pm

Mj wrote:Was referring to the one labelled 'where not to park your car ones?'... with the second shot of the cars below.... definitely four pelicans in that shot (at least that what I hope I'm seeing)... none of the others appear to have any appreciable chroma that I noticed. The chroma displayed is pretty much classic... lotsa contrast with the white feathered bird against a bright sky.


Ah.. thats almost a relief.. I hadn't thought that you meant those pics.. they havent been edited cept for a resize which is hopefully why it looks like that.. thanks heaps for your inputt... :)
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list... ;)
User avatar
Bindii
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: Ormeau Hills Queensland

Postby Finch on Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:34 pm

No. 4 by a country mile, IMHO

Great work :D

Cheers

Michael
User avatar
Finch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:49 pm
Location: Keperra, Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques