I wanted to try something different...Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
23 posts
• Page 1 of 1
I wanted to try something different...with my pelican shots... the background was terrible (sunnylass will tell ya).. so I thought.. why not try and incorporate it in the shot instead of trying to hide it...
I did a few of the more normal ones (clear background) also but do you think that the others work?.. The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
yes.... the #1 and #2 are sharp and beautiful.
1st one is a great capture. Very well done! As for your question, yes they work
#1 is an amazing shot in that the humanoids are taking absolutely no interest in the bloody great birdie that could dump an amazing amount of poo on them, judging by its size
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Typical of you Chris,but really as Theo said, they are Nicely done,and blend very well,good job Bindii Cheers NeoN http://www.redbubble.com/people/neophytos
They definitely work for me.
The last two are good, but you sort of look at them, think to yourself "They're nice shots" and move on. The first two however, you look at the bird, then your eye goes around taking in the rest of the photo, then you come back to the bird again. At least that's what it does to me. Well done Bindii __________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
Wow! love them all again!
C&C more than welcome!
Canon 300d...(hopefully not for too long though) http://www.redbubble.com/people/HandleBars
love the DOF in the 2nd one! Great stuff Bindii!
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
I agree with you there They are all great shots though
I think #1 is a cracker. The background gives context and adds to the image, yet the Pelican is mostly on the plain wall so it still remains seperated from an essentially 'busy' background. I think you achieved exactly what you set out for with that one!
I also like #3, always loved watching pelicans land when we had a house by the lake as a kid!
I agree the first two work for me and the other ones are ho um..... Mal
I've got a camera, it's black. I've got some lens, they are black as well.
Have you though of more blurr for the bg in #1 and #2?
All good shots though. I imagine it won't be long before we see you advertising all your Canon gear for sale? You are certainly making the S5 sing.
Sue, these are crackers. Just fantastic.
Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
great shots with the different perspective
Shane
Life's too short to be sad ! http://bigred4x4.blogspot.com/2008/01/welcome.html http://bigred.redbubble.com
I have to say I'm a big fan of #4. IMO having the head and body perfectly sharp and the wings and feet ever so slightly blurred provides a perfect balance between still life and motion. It seems to breath just enough life into the photo. Nice work.
Matt
Canon 5DmkII + Grip | Canon 400D + Grip | 17-40 f/4 L USM | 24-105 f/4 L IS USM | 70-200 f/2.8 L IS USM | 2 x 580 EX II | Manfrotto Stabilizing Stuff
I love #1 - fantastic !!!!!!
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
Sue... certainly the shots with something other than straight water etc are far more interesting... some of these are just plain good fun!!! A bird in the water is... well... yawn
However... as you've put these up for critique... your PP treatment of the birds is somewhat over sharpened. Might I suggest backing off a tad on the sharpening ??? Also the top right pelican in the last pic seems to have acquired some chroma (unless it's head really is purple?). Apologies for being a killjoy Michael. Photography is not a crime, but perhaps my abuse of artistic license is?
No crit away.. all is good.. Point taken on the sharpening.. I didn't sharpen in the original proccessing only once I resized and more than likely I forgot to reduce the opacity of it once done.. funny that you mentioned the chroma.. (lost on the top right pelican thing though as there is only one pelican in the last pic)..cause when I viewed these pics on my work monitor today the chroma was terrible... but I can't see it at all on this monitor at home.. I'd be interested to hear if anyone else can see it (maybe my montior needs calibrating/trashing etc??).. thanks for the crit.. much appreciated.. The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
Was referring to the one labelled 'where not to park your car ones?'... with the second shot of the cars below.... definitely four pelicans in that shot (at least that what I hope I'm seeing)... none of the others appear to have any appreciable chroma that I noticed. The chroma displayed is pretty much classic... lotsa contrast with the white feathered bird against a bright sky.
Photography is not a crime, but perhaps my abuse of artistic license is?
Ah.. thats almost a relief.. I hadn't thought that you meant those pics.. they havent been edited cept for a resize which is hopefully why it looks like that.. thanks heaps for your inputt... The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
Previous topic • Next topic
23 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|