skate!Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
skate!borrowed the 10.5mm fishy from work for a couple of days, so went to the local skate park for a bit of a skate and to take some photos with this awesome lens...i think i might have to buy it
any C&C is always appreciated, hope u like. selective blur, i like it, but what are your thoughts? thanks for looking Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
wow
I think they are all superb Just how did you make those last to work, light wise whizzzz, there goes life again.....
But now captured on a Canon 40D with bits http://www.flickr.com/photos/wazonthehill/
i don't know if i'm being too harsh... but this is a crit section afterall.
the lack of (lack of) saturation bugs me -- they look dull and lifeless. not sure about selective blur. i dont think i like it. i know the 10.5 gives you sweet fuck all dof separation, even at 2.8, but its something you need to live with rather than try and fix in PP (i think). if you want some DOF sep with fisheye, get a hassy or bronny MF haha. ps. good to see something other than the usual photos that get peddled around here! body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8. flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4) jamesdwade.com dishonourclothing.com
I am not a big skater fan, but I reckon these look really good - I too would be interested in how you lit these as the cross-lighting doesn't seem too hard, particularly in 3 & 4, although these could just be exposed for the skater.
The second one is a stand out - the colours give it a steely look to them. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
#2 is fantastic! Well done - buy the fisheye!!
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
NJ
You seem to always shoot against the light? This blocks up your skater and robs you of contrast. Is this a style thing that you've chosen to do or is it just the light working against you? Is there a reason why you don't pop a little flash into the image? Your images do have a touch of the dramatic about them but I feel that technically there is more to be had from the situations you photograph. Cheers Regards
Matt. K
thanks all for the feedback.
exposure wise, i just exposed for the scene, and then dodged the skater a lil bit in ps. didnt worry about flash, wasnt the look i wanted out of these, although i did use it for shots that i didnt post here. only reason im shooting into the sun in two of them was that there were too many people on the other side of the stairs, and was way too busy, it was the best option. appreciate ur feedback jamesw, as i i know this is your area. selective blur was only an idea, not necessarily to compensate for no dof. and i see where u are coming from in regards to the desaturation. was just another idea i rolled with. thanks again. Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
ohh yeah man i forgot to say
get in close with it hey, like really close. you can get some really unique shots. i have a photo to show you guys, i was in so close that the guy was literally on top of me... i'll post it up later tonight maybe. body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8. flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4) jamesdwade.com dishonourclothing.com
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|