High Key portrait shotsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
High Key portrait shotsI am still learning how to set up lights for different kinds of shots. Today, I was aiming for simple high key lighting. I think I still have a long way to go, but I would appreciate your feedback. We were limited in terms of spacial lay out as our family room is reasonably crampt.
Two of Alicia & Alex: Two shots of Alicia by herself: My own criticism: 1. Our monitor is uncalibrated so the WB may be off, and the shots could do with some more contrast, I reckon. 2. If I could, I would place the main background light further away from the camera angle. I would appreciate yours. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: High Key portrait shots1st and third catch my eye.. I like them.. not so sure on the colour in the last one though..
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
Re: High Key portrait shotsThanks Sue. My WB is somewhat off. Here is a link to the original version of the last one before I thought to change the colour appearance. I think this one is a little dark.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: High Key portrait shots
Well on my monitor the colour is far better in the unedited version.. I really like it as it is actually.. The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
Re: High Key portrait shotsI love the first one !!!! Looks like a shot from a catalogue - vibrant colours, movement - great stuff
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
Re: High Key portrait shotsPatrick,
First on is most definitely pick of the bunch for this style... #2 and #4 are off colour and somewhat blown. #3 isn't quite right somehow... I think that Alicia is not fully in focus (at least her hands are OOO which doesn't work for me in this style). Hard to do this sort of thing without plenty of working room for the lights and camera though. Michael Photography is not a crime, but perhaps my abuse of artistic license is?
Re: High Key portrait shotsThanks for the feedback guys. For the shots of Alicia by herself, and some of her with Alex, I had the camera on a tripod with cable release and using manual focus. However, this , I later realised, caused problems including changing composition and relative DOF if Alicia moved. The reason I did it was to allow me to interact better with them both when they were sitting.
It is obvious from my own observations and the feedback that my laptop needs calibration. Michael, I think the "blown" appearance might stem from the background light (camera right) which is spilling into the frame, causing some flare and loss of contrast. This follows on to your comment about working space! Thanks again guys, much appreciated. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: High Key portrait shotsHi Patrick,
The second is a cracker. Fantastic. Cheers Warwick
======= Canon 40D : 350D Canon 18-55mm : Canon 75-300mm IS USM : Sigma 30mm EX HSM DC 1.4 : Sigma 10-20mm
Re: High Key portrait shotsPatrick,
I think this is some of your best stuff yet! As already mentioned the WB is a little off in some of them but that can be fixed easily with (as you say) a calibrated monitor. It worked well to interact with them both and the eye contact, poses and vibrance of these shots are excellent! I don't think there's an issue with contrast personally. In the last two of Alicia, did u have a fan blowing in her face? Her hair seems to be blown somewhat (which is a good effect actually). Keep up the great work, can't wait to see more when you have a bit more room to move! Excellent! Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Re: High Key portrait shots
Thanks Geoff (& Warwick), Geoff, I notice it was much easier to get Alex's attention when I wasn't hidden by the camera, although this caused a few compositional problems as already mentioned (I couldn't physically go back any further with the tripod!). I did use a fan to get some hair movement in all of them. I find it gives it a bit more of a "fresher" look which I think is consistant with the high key look I was after. I will admit I don't think it worked in all of them. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: High Key portrait shotsI really like the shots, and I like your idea of stepping out from behind the camera to get a better interaction and response from your models. I'd say stopping down the lens a little more to give more DOF and (when you have the space, which you said you didn't) shooting a little wider could help with the composition and focus issues. And as has been said the WB on the first of Alicia by herself is better then the second.
Re: High Key portrait shotsI think the images are poorly framed. Cutting off the elbows,fingers and the top of the head and the hands normally weakens the composition. How we use the edges of the image space is often problematic and should be thought about long and hard before making the exposure. Note that in the last image the point of interest is her head/face....but it only occupies about 15% of the image space. The rest of the image space holds nothing of interest to the viewer and is therefore wasted resolution. In the second image we have 2 points of interest being the faces/eyes of the subjects. This device works best when the heads are mucher closer together. If there is too much distance or space between them then we have 2 seperate images in the one photo...this also weakens composition.
The lighting is not bad and as you say,still needs some work before it's perfect high-key. Maybe you should avoid dark colours when going for the high look? Hope this is useful? Regards
Matt. K
Re: High Key portrait shotsThanks for the feedback, Craig & Matt.
Craig - your point about stopping down the lens makes sense. I originally didn't as I wasn't getting enough light on the background at f8 or smaller to blow out the background, but then realised I could have fixed this later. Matt - thanks for the comments regarding composition. A fair amount of the "composition" was a result of cropping out unwanted elements in the frame and then trying to balance the composition which meant, in some cases, chopping off bodily bits and pieces. However, I note and agree with what you said, and will take this into account for future shoots. The choice of clothing was aimed at providing contrast against the background, although perhaps, as you imply, this contradicts the high-key look. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|