Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by chrisk on Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:10 pm
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52bd9/52bd987883fca70251575d20c0a85d7700603913" alt="User avatar"
chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by Alpha_7 on Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:14 pm
Stunning, Gorgeous, I don't have the words! Awesome.
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ce78/9ce78dcfa32480e077b2ec3c1e9d936056c64e85" alt="User avatar"
Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by marcotrov on Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:27 pm
Rooz they are all absolutely brilliant data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0209/e020955aef831b6623857d9a07886dc08f50192a" alt="Smile :)" The last in particular you have really combined that shallow DOF with your compositional skills to produce a real winner. Hell #2 also cheers marco
Last edited by marcotrov on Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
marcotrov
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
- Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia
by sirhc55 on Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:32 pm
Rooz, if you are this good with a camera just imagine how brilliant you could be with a brush and palette data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03366/03366c32d6ebdc9f22c7424b69f9f1586b3a0c33" alt="Wink :wink:"
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db33d/db33dee440d20756319ae50de353b3b5b4671004" alt="User avatar"
sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by the foto fanatic on Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:15 am
IMHO #1 and #2 are just wonderful - outstanding colour rendition especially. #2 is one of the best spider pictures I've ever seen. Congratulations!
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f9d8/7f9d822ef374528823d487832e00d2821aad5cfd" alt="User avatar"
the foto fanatic
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
- Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane
-
by johnd on Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:08 am
Rooz, what those said. The dof work is excellent and the R1 is producing beautiful even light. cheers John
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9461b/9461b689ec2374aa6423bfb46f3aaba55ff40dea" alt="User avatar"
johnd
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1342
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
- Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.
-
by Blokeman on Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:33 am
I reckon the second is outstanding, the colour is outrageous. The first and third have a kind of surreal quality, I can see what you were after...
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4528f/4528f6ca5bb3e36d1c243d93b2cd7fa13d51906f" alt="User avatar"
Blokeman
- Newbie
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:03 pm
- Location: Margaret River
-
by chrisk on Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:56 pm
thanks everyone. appreciate the feedback. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0209/e020955aef831b6623857d9a07886dc08f50192a" alt="Smile :)" 6 comments for a thread that doesn;t contain a gorgeous half-naked woman ! dayum...these must be pretty good. lol the spider shot is one of my favourites. its just a bummer i missed the focus point though. you can see his eyes aren;t totally crisp. not sure if i misfocussed a little or his head just moved at the wrong time or what. it bugs the crap outta me the more i look at it actually. lol RE: lighting for that pic. sbr1 on camera directed at subject. sbr2 on camera and aimed behind subject, (over his head), to try and get some contrast in the tone of the pink. imo that "light and shade" of the colour makes it work. (the strong colour also distracts people from the misfocussed eyes lol)
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52bd9/52bd987883fca70251575d20c0a85d7700603913" alt="User avatar"
chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by Ladybird on Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:59 pm
Okay, I'm going against the grain here. I'd think the DOF in #1 is too shallow and agree with you that #2's focus is just off.
# 3 is my fav here as I love the idea, the composition and the colours. I only wish there was more DOF.
Sorry but JMHO.
I'll try to be a bit nicer, if you try to be a bit smarter.
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a05ef/a05ef1bf3cd2e79e7fce54071ae7b816ee01f4c1" alt="User avatar"
Ladybird
- Member
-
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 6:01 pm
- Location: Brisbane, Queensland
by Big V on Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:38 pm
The spider shot is the best of the series for me and it is becuae of the colours, slightly better focus and the way the leaf contour compliments the contour made by the eyes. I personally would like to have seen a bit more depth of filed and focus in th eother two but that is just me. Lovely colours overall though..
Canon
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3fd5b/3fd5b657f4f4d414a0323e837b56351cb6565c3e" alt="User avatar"
Big V
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2301
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:37 am
- Location: Adelaide
by colin_12 on Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:47 pm
Two is an excellent concept. I would also like to see just a touch more in focus just forward enough to catch the other two legs. It is a great set of colour though. Regards Colin
Regards Colin Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d21a/3d21a6b6bdd0965317f4be20a22468f8e0dd47de" alt="User avatar"
colin_12
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
- Location: Hazelbrook
by chrisk on Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:26 pm
Ladybird wrote:Okay, I'm going against the grain here. I'd think the DOF in #1 is too shallow and agree with you that #2's focus is just off.
# 3 is my fav here as I love the idea, the composition and the colours. I only wish there was more DOF.
Sorry but JMHO.
pls, no need to be sorry. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0209/e020955aef831b6623857d9a07886dc08f50192a" alt="Smile :)" everyone has their own opinion on what they like/ don't like/ prefer. personally i shoot at very wide apertures becasue i prefer the effect. every now and then i'll shoot to get the image sharp at around f8 but almost never shoot past f11. my experience with this forum is that most members here are not big on that idea which is cool. most people here prefer small apertures, (especially for macros), and most of the frame in focus. there's no right or wrong, just preference. btw: when i say i didn't nail he focus in the spider shot, i meant that it was probably user error. i like the dof the way it is but i miscued and i didn;t get it dead right. when you work with macro lens', extension tubes and large apertures there is a very fine line. thank you for taking the time to give your POV.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52bd9/52bd987883fca70251575d20c0a85d7700603913" alt="User avatar"
chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by Yi-P on Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:25 pm
Stunning colours data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3380c/3380c39f3e6d996fba801c2ac18430a6ba9afb79" alt="Very Happy :D"
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d5cb/6d5cb1797aae74b7a5563479b881e195d0f740cf" alt="User avatar"
Yi-P
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
- Location: Sydney -- Ashfield
-
by devilla101 on Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:35 pm
Some lovely colors there and really cool macro shots
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06dd9/06dd9d15ae7ee99e9162750f146acf2acfcdaaf6" alt="User avatar"
devilla101
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 604
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:48 pm
- Location: Rockdale, Sydney, Australia
-
by zafra52 on Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:44 pm
Lovely images and beautiful colours, but at least one third of the portrait pictures appear cut off. I experienced the same effect with an image I posted yesterday till I reduce the width to 600px. I don't think this website can accept the 800px width. This is perplexing! I just saw the beautiful falcon images in their full width of 800px and yet no cropping happens with them???
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f263/4f2637f59bc79d35553b08e1bd2c5b9f0cddeb40" alt="User avatar"
zafra52
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4845
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
- Location: Brisbane
by Matt. K on Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:14 pm
Rooz You are an artist.
Regards
Matt. K
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9a3b/b9a3b95454e6b264eb7b4fffcec9431680c2c284" alt="User avatar"
Matt. K
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
-
- Posts: 9981
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: North Nowra
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|