Saddle Back MountainModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Saddle Back MountainThis image was taken on Christmas Day 2007 for family members that were moving away from the area, they thought it would be nice for me to record the view so they had a reminder of their own home. This has been processed via photomatix (HDR), they requested the processing for a more painted look.
Re: Saddle Back MountainGreat shot Craig...does it differ much from straight out of the camera? To my eyes it doesn't look like a lot of PP (HDR) has been done. Would be interested to see the original shot.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Re: Saddle Back MountainBeautiful country landscape Graig,and a good HDR.Pity they had to leave such a nice area,but that"s life i suppose.
Cheers NeoN http://www.redbubble.com/people/neophytos
Re: Saddle Back MountainGeoff, just for you here is the unprocessed and unstraightened original.
Not that different, but overall a slightly different feel.
Re: Saddle Back MountainWell done with that HDR Craig. I've found the secret to using Photomatix is not too go to far overboard. Enhance the image but keep it believable. You have done that well.
Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Re: Saddle Back MountainCraig,
The HDR shot is fantastic. A lot more POP that the orig. Cheers. Warwick
======= Canon 40D : 350D Canon 18-55mm : Canon 75-300mm IS USM : Sigma 30mm EX HSM DC 1.4 : Sigma 10-20mm
Re: Saddle Back MountainGreat shot Craig... and a beautiful location. It would be tough to have to leave there.
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
Re: Saddle Back MountainI can't believe that they are leaving that view! And cracking edit there also... you really made it pop!
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|