|
Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
 by Bob G on Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:57 pm
I have been mucking about with some of the new samples of Harman Gloss paper and my first impressions are that it could take over from Crane Museo Silver Rag as my favourite gloss/ semi gloss paper with Hahnemuhle Photo Rag still holding the matt paper crown. My son recently signed a contract to by a unit in Brisbane and commented that his girlfriend liked my Storey Bridge Photo. So I want to print and frame it and will prepare the print on the Harman Gloss at 16.5" by 30". Downloaded Harman's ICC profiles and the initial first prints were nice but after playing in Photoshop ACR and with Smart Objects I lightened up the bottom half of the pic and in Print it Makes all the difference. Maybe not as good on screen as in print? What do you think? Revisited Version  Previous Post Version  Bob
"Wake up and smell the pixels!"
-
Bob G
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 1:52 am
- Location: Mooloolaba, Sunshine Coast, Qld.
-
by whitey on Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:17 am
Love the revisited version, looks much clearer to me and the light relfections really gleam.
D80, 50mm F/1.8, 18-70mm DX, Sigma 10-20mm
-
whitey
- Member
-
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:07 pm
- Location: Paddington, Sydney
by radar on Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:49 am
Bob,
the revised version is much nicer, more details and by having cropped a bit off the bottom, it brings out the light reflections in the water even more.
cheers,
André
Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
-
radar
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2823
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 am
- Location: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000
-
by Handlebars on Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:47 am
 The revised edition is much better. There is alot more depth to the clouds, and the colours feel much fuller. Will look great on any wall. 
-
Handlebars
- Member
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 3:34 am
- Location: Wattle Grove, Perth
by Reschsmooth on Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:52 am
I agree with comments regarding the revised photo. Looking at it more, now, I would comment that it is actually a shame the bridge is there - I reckon the road bottom right and the city foreshore provide a great leading line and the bridge actually distracts a bit for it (maybe that is because it isn't as good as our Harbour Bridge?  ) This is just my comment regarding the view of the city from that location. Still, an excellent photo. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-
Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|
