Printer Discussion

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Printer Discussion

Postby W00DY on Sat Jan 26, 2008 5:18 pm

I hope this does not turn out to be a Canon v's Epson thread :chook:

I might be in the market for a A3+ printer and was wondering if there were any obvious benefits from either company?

Do either printers produce better quality (consistently) than the other?
Do most professionals use Epson or Canon?
Do either company provide better service than the other?

Thoughts?
:D
Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
User avatar
W00DY
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: Sydney - Hills District

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby christiand on Sat Jan 26, 2008 5:27 pm

Hi Woody,

my response is probably not really going to assist regarding quality and service
of and for Canon or Epson printers because I hadn't had a chance to compare both.
However I have seen fantastic results from Epson - the ANU Arts section in Canberra is using Epson.
I felt abandoned by Canon when a few years ago they didn't release a Windos XP driver for their BJC 5100.
Was actually quite peeved and am very hesitant to buy any more Canon products.

Cheers,
CD
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby gstark on Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:47 pm

Andrew: Epson R1800.

Produces great images, good value, and heaps of us use one.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby W00DY on Sat Jan 26, 2008 7:04 pm

gstark wrote:Andrew: Epson R1800.

Produces great images, good value, and heaps of us use one.


That was very definite :!: :!: :!:
Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
User avatar
W00DY
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: Sydney - Hills District

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby photograham on Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:22 pm

Whilst I am an Epson fan, I have read excellent reports on a Hewlett Packard 9180. Said to be as good by those who tested it. (The Image Doctors on the Nikonians podcast).
User avatar
photograham
Member
 
Posts: 213
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Pakenham, Vic

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby Killakoala on Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:26 pm

Epson. The others just aren't quite there. Although, that said, the Top Canons are still pretty good.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby cawdor on Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:43 pm

Overall I think the following applies to inkjets, after reading A LOT of reviews:

1. Epson - best quality
2. Canon - cheapest to run (though not by much)
3. HP - rubbish

My personal experience with inkjets supports #1 and #3. I would NEVER buy a HP printer again after seeing the performance (or complete lack of) at home and in a corporate environment.
Tim
D300 | D200 | F90x | 70-200 f2.8 VR | Tamron 90 f2.8 Macro | Tokina 12-24 f4 | Sigma 18-50 f2.8 Macro | Nikon SB-800
cawdor
Member
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby W00DY on Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:46 pm

Looks like there is no chance of a Canon v's Epson debate (which is a good thing)... Epson is winning hands down :up:

Has anyone seen/used the new Epson R1900???
Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
User avatar
W00DY
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: Sydney - Hills District

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby Glen on Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:42 pm

Andrew, from the recesses of my memory I seem to remember your name and Mac. I believe you may want to do research on how well Epsons play with Mac if that is the case.
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby -=Monty=- on Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:48 pm

I'm also in the market for an A3 printer. Was looking around, and found a few Canon i9950's on ebay. What are they like? Reviews say great, but its a little older now. They're selling for around $300 used, which i can easily afford.
D300|D70|24-70mm|70-200mm VR II|10.5mm Fisheye|70-300VR|50mm F1.8|Rokinon 85mm f1.4|SB-900/800/600
flickr
-=Monty=-
Member
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:33 am
Location: Geelong, Vic -----------D300

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby gstark on Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:08 pm

Glen wrote:Andrew, from the recesses of my memory I seem to remember your name and Mac. I believe you may want to do research on how well Epsons play with Mac if that is the case.


I have no issues printing from my MacBook onto the R1800.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby Glen on Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:38 pm

gstark wrote:
Glen wrote:Andrew, from the recesses of my memory I seem to remember your name and Mac. I believe you may want to do research on how well Epsons play with Mac if that is the case.


I have no issues printing from my MacBook onto the R1800.



Probably means I am wrong, I just vaguely remember some Mac issues, but as I have no Mac didn't bother to properly remember them
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby Matt. K on Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:38 pm

Andrew
I run 4 Epson R800s and 2 Epson A3 2100 printers for my classes. I have only had one issue with a R800 which is currently being repaired and I suspect may simply be a fuse. The printers get rough handling and a lot of use during the courses. The quality of the output is excellent. I have not used Canon printers but have no doubt they are also excellent printers. I suspect that Epson might have an edge on overall quality at the higher resolutions.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby ATJ on Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:46 pm

I have an Epson Photo 830. It produces fantastic quality but a big drawback (at least with this model) is that as I don't use it regularly, I end up using about half the ink on cleaning the heads. :(
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby W00DY on Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:02 pm

Glen wrote:
gstark wrote:
Glen wrote:Andrew, from the recesses of my memory I seem to remember your name and Mac. I believe you may want to do research on how well Epsons play with Mac if that is the case.


I have no issues printing from my MacBook onto the R1800.



Probably means I am wrong, I just vaguely remember some Mac issues, but as I have no Mac didn't bother to properly remember them


I did a google search and couldn't see any glaring issues :?:

Matt. K wrote:Andrew
I run 4 Epson R800s and 2 Epson A3 2100 printers for my classes. I have only had one issue with a R800 which is currently being repaired and I suspect may simply be a fuse. The printers get rough handling and a lot of use during the courses. The quality of the output is excellent. I have not used Canon printers but have no doubt they are also excellent printers. I suspect that Epson might have an edge on overall quality at the higher resolutions.


Thanks Matt. Seems like Epson could be the way to go.

So I take it nobody has used the Epson R1900???
Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
User avatar
W00DY
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: Sydney - Hills District

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby christiand on Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:08 pm

Just another thought:

If you don't print a lot of lets say A4 or A3 size prints, it may be more economical
to have someone like Hardly Normal, BigW or whoever print the odd one for you.
You wouldn't have to worry about maintenance, inks, problems, etc.
Have someone else have the problems with owning a printer :)

HTH,
CD
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby MATT on Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:13 pm

I did read on another forum of a member having difficulties printing for the r3800(I think) and an iMac. Could not work it out so returned it. Epson blames apple, apple blames epson..

Goodluck
MATT
User avatar
MATT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1748
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Location: Biloela, QLD-----nikon--D700-----

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby Viz on Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:49 pm

I know that this is a bit of a jump, but I used an Epson Stylus Pro 7600 for about 2 years without any fuss until I physically broke a contact on the maintenance tank, which was quickly and easily fixed. I think it needed head cleaning only once, though it was constantly in use as a proofing machine. I used genuine ink cartridges and a third party photo paper from Anitech http://www.anitech.com.au/products.php? ... 1&rID=8041 - though i am unsure about this for commercial photographic purposes. I have to recommend epson based on this experience.
Dan The Batch Automator
User avatar
Viz
Member
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:46 pm
Location: Leichhardt, Sydney

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby harry03199 on Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:36 pm

christiand wrote:Just another thought:

If you don't print a lot of lets say A4 or A3 size prints, it may be more economical
to have someone like Hardly Normal, BigW or whoever print the odd one for you.
You wouldn't have to worry about maintenance, inks, problems, etc.
Have someone else have the problems with owning a printer :)

HTH,
CD


Hi, I did a wedding Nov last year. did a couple of test prints at the local Big W, colour was washed out. ( heard later that they been having prob for a while.) Next went to a Photomart for same prints, same probs, Although they were more helpfull trying to correct the washed out colour. and HM was not much better. In the end used my colour laser printer, ( bought printfx to colour correct first) came out pretty good.

My suggestion is do a couple of test prints first, at where-ever your happy with.

Harry.
Canon Bodies, Canon Lenses, Manfrotto Tripods. + Other Gear.
harry03199
Newbie
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 4:35 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby sirhc55 on Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:55 pm

Epson work very well with Mac :wink:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby Nnnnsic on Sun Feb 10, 2008 11:30 pm

Before the generation of the Epson R800, I would have suggested Canon's namely because older Epson models chewed through ink as if it was oxygen on a treeless planet, but these days I'd go for the Epson models. The Epson R1800 and now R1900 seem to best the Canon models they take on and the ink Epson use seems to be of a better quality. It's taken Canon a bit of extra time to take on the idea of long-lasting inks and while I think the Canon blue is better than the Epson blue, I think that unless you're buying A2 and above, the Epson's are an easy win over the Canon's.

At A2 and above, it gets into interesting territory.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby Pehpsi on Sun Feb 10, 2008 11:49 pm

I don't print, but recently found a Canon Pixma ip2200 lying around my house, still in the box. Would it be worth opening and hooking-up you think?
Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR

20" iMac Intel C2D
Aperture 2.1
PS CS3

http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
User avatar
Pehpsi
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Kingsgrove, Sydney

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby mikephotog on Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:21 pm

I use an Epson R1800 and very happy with it. Could have got the R2400 which is better with B/W but liked the CD printing capabilites of the R1800. I now use "QTR" with the R1800 wich is a free RIP that gives me perfectly neutral B/W prints.

http://www.quadtonerip.com
mikephotog
Member
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 11:25 pm
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Melbourne

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby W00DY on Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:43 pm

:D :D :D Just picked my R1900 up :D :D :D

Won't be setting it up for a few days though as we are moving house. Can't wait to run some test's through it, apparently with a new orange ink skin tones are much nicer on this model. Plus it supports roll paper and CD/DVD printing.

I could not justify the 4880 just yet :D
Last edited by W00DY on Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
User avatar
W00DY
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: Sydney - Hills District

Re: Printer Discussion

Postby mickeyjuice on Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:02 pm

photograham wrote:Whilst I am an Epson fan, I have read excellent reports on a Hewlett Packard 9180.

Same here - I know a few very good photogs in the US who are using them with great results.

christiand wrote:If you don't print a lot of lets say A4 or A3 size prints, it may be more economical
to have someone like Hardly Normal, BigW or whoever print the odd one for you.

Yeah, seconded. I've got an Epson R230 that I use for A4, and am very happy with, but I'm debating an A3 printer. Several mates who are pro snappers suggest HN on the Fuji Frontier.
cheers, juice
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mickeyjuice/
A bunch of Canon stuff (including Canon & Sigma lenses). Way more gear than talent.
User avatar
mickeyjuice
Member
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 12:48 am
Location: West Brunswick, Victoria


Return to General Discussion