Early morning held hand pano of Port Solent

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Early morning held hand pano of Port Solent

Postby kipper on Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:43 pm

Sorry admins, but this is 1280 wide. I would have liked to have gone more but I didn't want to cause too many problems. Was a handheld pano, taken landscape not portrait mode. It was only when I took the pan of Fareham Creek later that morning that I thought I should be taking the shots in portrait. Furthering the point about plenty of photos to take in Europe. Basically I walked out the front door of where I was staying (friends house) with D70 in hand and shot, rotated, shot etc. They live just up the road from Portchester castle. Unfortunately due to laziness I didn't get any shots of that! To the right of the picture you can see The Spinaker Tower that has been built at Gunwharf Quay. It was meant to be completed by 2000 for the Millenium but it looks like it will be completed this year. That's if the French concrete doesn't have too much lime content and corrodes all the steel structure!!


<img src="http://www.morganpost.com/Port%20Solent.jpg">
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby kipper on Wed Feb 16, 2005 10:03 pm

Hmm.
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby Killakoala on Wed Feb 16, 2005 10:55 pm

kipper wrote:Hmm.


Hmm indeed.

It is a very 'industrial' looking pano. Very dark, gloomy and foreboding. Quite appropriate colours for the subject i feel.

A bit bent on one end though.

Thanks for sharing.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby christiand on Wed Feb 16, 2005 10:56 pm

also hmhh ...
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra

Postby kipper on Thu Feb 17, 2005 8:13 am

Never really noticed the bend until you mentioned it. The downside of handholding it I guess. You can see now why I was eager to buy a tripod over there!

Guess I'll just have to go back with gitzo in hand and take it again.
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

No point of interest

Postby the foto fanatic on Thu Feb 17, 2005 8:24 am

Sorry kipper, but there is nothing in this photo to command a viewer's attention.

The fact that it is a pano and takes some skill to assemble probably wouldn't cross the mind of Joe Average, ao you need something to make him look. I don't think the light/clouds thing is enough.

I'm sure you are going to produce much better panos in the future.

Sorry to be brutal.
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby dooda on Thu Feb 17, 2005 8:42 am

There is some foreground potential in the when puddle thingies not far from the front.
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby MATT on Thu Feb 17, 2005 8:58 am

Kipper one question,

what software are you using for pano constraction?

Thanks

MATT
User avatar
MATT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1748
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Location: Biloela, QLD-----nikon--D700-----

Postby stubbsy on Thu Feb 17, 2005 10:25 am

kipper

I saw this image when you first posted and it left me completely unexcited. I held off posting because I was hoping the problem was with my perceptions of the image, but having read the other posts since I've decided to come back and post some thoughts.

While there may be technical merit to the image, I find it too dull in both appearance and content to appeal to me. There's nothing in the image that grabs me on first glance and pulls me in to a closer examination and I think that is the essence of a good image. I know this may sound a little harsh, but I'm offering this in a constructive way. I think your (well justified) pleasure in the technical achievement may have blinded you a little to the other qualities of the image.

Like others have said already, this is a good start, but I'm confident you can do much better than this. I look forward to seeing many more panos from you as you consolidate and refine your skills.

Cheers
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby kipper on Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:13 am

Hmmm......Well I've taken the comments in and had a look at the image. I agree there isn't a lot to the shot. Maybe if I'd also captured Portchester castle in the foreground (would of meant going up the road) it might of made a better shot. It was suppose to be just a pano of Portsmouth and Gosport over looking Port Solent. Which I think it's captured quite well. Trust me if you've ever seen these two towns up close you wouldn't really think much of them. I know there is nothing that really captures the viewers attention, the only interesting part of the horizon is the Spinaker Tower. The most part that I liked about this photo was the clouds and the sun. Going from a bright orange to a soft apricot color, with a few greys and blues mixed in. I found it quite a moody shot to me.
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby stubbsy on Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:43 pm

Kipper

Maybe my niceness pills hadn't taken effect fully when I posted earlier :) I agree with you about the clouds & sun, it's the rest that lets that part of the image down. Of course having never been there I may be missing the quality of the image as a representation of what these places look like.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby kipper on Thu Feb 17, 2005 5:04 pm

Matt, software used was Panorama Factory 3.3
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby MATT on Thu Feb 17, 2005 9:53 pm

Thanks Kipper I'll give the trial ago.

One other Q. How many shots do you htink is ideal for a pano.

I did one of our local dam that was about 9or 10 shots it turn out rediculous. I t looked ok but want happy.

MATT
User avatar
MATT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1748
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Location: Biloela, QLD-----nikon--D700-----


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques