Year of the rat? I don't think so.Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Year of the rat? I don't think so.Regards
Matt. K
Re: Year of the rat? I don't think so.Lol. Love it, Matt.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Re: Year of the rat? I don't think so.Thanks Matt .....
shouldn't this have come with a "Not While You're Eating Dinner" warning? Nikon D700 D300
Re: Year of the rat? I don't think so.That looks like my neighbour's dog if it had been hit by a steamroller!
I guess that would stop it from barking... TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Re: Year of the rat? I don't think so.Matt, you are one sick bunny
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Re: Year of the rat? I don't think so.Chris, I totally agree.
I cannot let my wife see this - she was born in the year of the rat. Cheers, CD
Re: Year of the rat? I don't think so.Bloody hilarious
Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
Re: Year of the rat? I don't think so.Perhaps this should be in the recipies section - Rat-au-van?
Re: Year of the rat? I don't think so.year of the fly?
g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Year of the rat? I don't think so.
Which is followed by year of the maggot D.M. - D200
12°11'34"S 136°46'24"E or there abouts
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|