frography 2Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
frography 2green tree frog...
striped marsh frog... striped marsh frog... Shane
Life's too short to be sad ! http://bigred4x4.blogspot.com/2008/01/welcome.html http://bigred.redbubble.com
Re: frography 2Great examples of Frogography Shane
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"
D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
Re: frography 2thanks John
Shane
Life's too short to be sad ! http://bigred4x4.blogspot.com/2008/01/welcome.html http://bigred.redbubble.com
Re: frography 2Shane,
The composition of the first is brilliant. The eye contact and the background help this shot. For me, the shot is let down by two things: * the debris on the frog's right hand * the harsh lighting which is causing multiple bright highlights The second one is nice and sharp but doesn't jump out. I'm not really sure why. Perhaps it is the harsh lighting again. I must admit, I have never really got a good shot of that species of frog. The third one looks a little soft to me. This may again be the lighting.
Re: frography 2
1* i think it was a grass seed * i used a diffuser but couldn't bounce the flash off anything... i don't think the shiny skin helps 2*i didn't like the composition and the frog had tucked its legs in but it does give a good DOF and shows most of the Frog. 3* this was the first pic and i only had F8 and was only 50 -75 mm away but by the time i changed he had tucked up ... this is still my favorite of him. thanks for the comments Shane
Life's too short to be sad ! http://bigred4x4.blogspot.com/2008/01/welcome.html http://bigred.redbubble.com
Re: frography 2Shane,
Yeah, the shiny skin can be a real problem. I tried all sorts of things like small diffusers and kept having problems until someone suggested a softbox. A Google search found a couple of simple DIY designs and an hour later I had not only a paper prototype, but a cardboard one that I have using for a couple of months. It is amazing how much difference it makes, especially for frogs. My softbox
Re: frography 2
Thanks for the link Andrew Shane
Life's too short to be sad ! http://bigred4x4.blogspot.com/2008/01/welcome.html http://bigred.redbubble.com
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|