Nature seriesModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Nature seriesFeel free to C&C
The stamens are lovely shame the fly wasn't quite in focus but thought it worth posting anyways This appealed to my perverse sense of humour. Naturally I called it 'stink bug orgy'! And this fellow was just hanging around the balcony at work. All taken with D80 and 18-55 kit lens Linda
Re: Nature seriesI gotta say, for a Nature series they don't look very natural..
#1 would be MUCH better with the Fly in focus, as you said. #2 is the best of the three and the most natural looking. Not too bad. #3 Looks very unnatural. Not sure how you've processed it, but it looks really weird to me. Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
Re: Nature seriesLinda,
1) As the fly dominates so much of the image, it really needs to be sharp. My eye gets drawn to it and then I'm disappointed that it is out of focus. Perhaps if the fly wasn't there, the nice sharp stamens would work. 2) Something is not quite right about this image. Either something has gone wrong in the post processing or you have a lot of camera shake. I see from the EXIF data that you were using a lens at 35mm and you were at 1/160s. Camera shake should not be a problem so I'm guessing the problem is with the post processing. How large was the original image and how much did you crop? 3) As already mentioned, post processing on this large image is odd. The colours look strange and there is a lot of pixelation of the image. What did you do from the shot to the JPEG being displayed?
Re: Nature seriesIn general the images all look slightly out of focus. What method were you using AF or manual? Were you using a tripod?
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"
D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
Re: Nature seriesThanks for the C&C (I think). I think my prob is that I like things that are a little different and not the norm and so I look at my pics in a different way. I do understand what people are saying from a pure photographic point of viewand so I guess that does give me a reason to keep practicing - one day I'll put a pic up here and will get rave reviews - just might die waiting
In the meantime does this mean that I can claim two titles - Queen of soft and provider of weird pics!!! Linda
Re: Nature seriesLinda,
The comments are only meant to help you with your images and are not a personal criticism of you or even your ability. If you are trying to achieve something different, tells us what your goal is and we may be able to better comment on your images.
Re: Nature seriesGood point ATJ.
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"
D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
Re: Nature seriesATJ and Oneputt
This newbie definitely is taking the criticisms in the spirit in which they have been given - she is more frustrated with her own ability - or more correctly lack there of at the present point in time which is why my last post read the way it did, will watch how I write things in future to ensure it comes across right though The good news is that I have just started a local photography course and thanks to the generosity of a forum member who let me try out their gear, now realise the difference a good tripod makes and plan to get one asap. Linda
Re: Nature seriesHi Linda, I know where you're coming from, all I can say is, be grateful for Andrew's comments. He's one of the few who bother to offer real and constructive critique. Far too often it is "Great shot!" or nothing at all.
Cheers Steffen. lust for comfort suffocates the soul
Re: Nature seriesHi Linda!...GREAT SHOTS!
Seriously though.....your composition and sense of colour are are well defined. You do need a tripod and that's a lesson that every newbie eventually learns. When you get the quality you are striving for then you are going to be a formidable nature photographer. Go for it! And keep posting! Regards
Matt. K
Re: Nature series
Thanks for the encouragement Linda
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|