Rugby: Waratahs v HurricanesModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Rugby: Waratahs v HurricanesThese were taken with the stock lenses that came with my 350d, and no tripod (silly me). While the af was incredibly slow, I'm still surprised with the quality of some of the shots that I got.
Then, at the end of the night, one of the media guys came over with his 1Dmk3 and 400mm f/2.8 and asked 'is that a canon?' I said 'yeah', he took of his 1D body and said 'see if it fits on this!' So I got a little play with a MASSIVE lens. Super fast af. Lovely. But very heavy. Got a great pic of a mates nostril from 15m away. Anyway, here's a scrum, a maul and some scenery. Camera shake is a problem when your team is up, and they score another try... click for big ^ I should probably crop the VB thing out of the bottom of this image.
Re: Rugby: Waratahs v HurricanesDid you give the 400mm lens back?
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: Rugby: Waratahs v Hurricanessadly, yes.
I would have struggled to smuggle that puppy out of the SFS though. It's not exactly small or light.
Re: Rugby: Waratahs v HurricanesNice set of shots. They look clear and well exposed. Love the last one, great atmosphere.
What kind of settings do you need in these conditions? Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
Re: Rugby: Waratahs v Hurricanesactually, the stadium lighting was very helpful!
I think, because I was using a 75-300mm lens with no tri/monopod, I bumped up the ISO to 800, to be able to use a really fast shutter speed. That said, I was still using the railing in front of the front row of seats to balance the camera on. Stupidly I left the aperture set at 5.6, where I could have gone down to 4 or whatever the maximum opening is on that lens, because of the distance away from the players. The struggles I found are: * gettting excited when we score a try - cheering while trying to hold the camera steady doesn't quite work! * knowing which shots to take, and which shots to not bother with. Often I'd be waiting for a player to break the line to get a shot, rather than getting a shot of Kurtley Beale in the motion of passing, or even running. Probably best in those instances when the backs are attacking the line, to just set the camera to rapid fire and shoot away. Often I'd also go for a shot of a maul or something, only to realise that Jerry Collins was standing in the way, obstructing anything of interest in a shot. The more landscapey shot was taken with the 18-55 from where I was sitting. It was early in the game, so along with the stadium lighting, there was also a bit of ambient light left in the sky - more than the photo seems to show.
Re: Rugby: Waratahs v Hurricaneswell done Matty. I guess its not a bad thing to combine the two - cheering and shooting your team at the same time even if it causes a bit of camera shake (not evident here)
SFS has come up really well- the last one gives a great sense of the event - very atmospheric lighting IMHO. It was nice of the press guy to lend you his lens - maybe with the D3 around now, we might see a few more Nikon snappers on the sidelines willing to 'share the love'! I'd love to get my hands on a 300 2.8 or a 400 one day and get amongst the action like that. BTW who won? (sorry AFL down this way!!) Great stuff - keep the posts coming. cheers R2
Re: Rugby: Waratahs v HurricanesTahs won! 20-3. We scored 3 tries + 1 disallowed try right on full time - ref called a forward pass. 'Canes only got one penalty kick, then their attack fell apart.
Re: Rugby: Waratahs v HurricanesThanks for the info
Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|