Three Sides to Every StoryModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
23 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Three Sides to Every StoryA shot of the Tropical House at Brisbane's Mt Coot-tha Botanical Gardens, levels adjusted and some diffuse glow added.
I couldn't resist calling it "Three Sides to Every Story". Appreciate any comments you may have. Simon. Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Thanks Glen and CD for your comments. Here's the original for comparison. I only took the shot with a view to using the geometry later...
Last edited by Manta on Fri Feb 18, 2005 8:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Gee, I'm blushing here... Thanks Chris. Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
An excellent shot Manta...
I also prefer the processed version - What steps did you take in PP??? Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Hey John - nice to hear from you (and on the very day I did a maintenance check on "Hard Rock" too!)
I was in a bit of a hurry with this one so I basically did a very slight crop, a levels adjustment, some slight cloning to get rid of a few annoying reflections and then the default Diffuse Glow filter settings. I had originally taken the shot thinking it would make a good black and White study and just ran the diffuse glow out of curiosity. When it came up okay I decided to keep it. Simon. Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Simon,
I may be going against the trend here, I like them both, but I really don't find the reflections annoying, if anything they add interest as you tend to go past the triangular shapes and look further into the picture. Well done. __________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
Good point Phillip. The postioning of the reflections in the corners of the triangles helped a lot too, allowing the view from the inside to come out. I like both shots but prefer the processed as as the surface seems opaque rather than translucent, making the inside view look like a reflection of something outside. The 'annoying' relfection I was talking about was that line of bright dots in the bottom left corner - they just didn't fit in with the rest of the image. Another one I cloned out was a leaf that was a bit bright in the lower centre. Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Simon
Superb - I prefer the PP version as I think you focus more on the geometric nature of the image. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Yeah...it's pretty hard to miss, isn't it! Thanks Peter. Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
I've tried some colour variations and will post some soon.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Heavily saturated version:
I duplicated the background, ran a red/blue gradient, twist filter, overlay blend mode. This 'swirled' the colour and saved having to colour individual segments. Last edited by Manta on Fri Feb 18, 2005 11:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Manta
Love the colour version. One thing though is it looks less like a photo and more like an illustration. Not sure if this is a good thing or a bad thing Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I think the colour adds a new dimension.
IMHO the original is the weakest of the pix, although the pattern of the triangles had potential. The latest version is quite striking.
Thanks everyone for the positive comments.
I agree the colourised version has gone beyond a photograph and moved into a more graphical/illustrative area. I'm pleased some of you like it but I still prefer the first processed version. What is obvious here is that strong geometric shapes can lend themselves to all kinds of treatment and can either be embellished into highly stylised and abstract art or even softened and blended for less striking photographic uses. I've also experimented with using this shot as a texture template and a lightened, desaturated version as a web page background. Cheers all and thanks for making this shot my most talked-about yet! (Doesn't say much for my other work, eh?!! ) Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
The first one is terrific. It lends focus on the shapes without totally eliminating the reflections and the inside of it. Much improved from the original. The PP'd one is good, but it is something you'd use for some specific Magazine assignment or something. I likey.
Previous topic • Next topic
23 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|