Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by stubbsy on Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:18 pm
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=218.gif)
stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by surenj on Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:47 pm
Nice set.. Wish there was a more interesting sky in the first. 2# - I like the oversharpened look 4# - is just Stellar.... ![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif) Really cool that you have got your workflow sorted... didn't know you could do this much from Lightroom...need to start tinkering..
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=2124_1229509618.gif)
surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by sheepie on Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:00 pm
Hey Peter... I think these look a bit oversharpened on my screen, but otherwise the colour looks good (if a little blue ![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif) ). I'd crop a bit off the top of the last one, but you know my preference for pano crops. Then again, just delete it - it's beyond repair ![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=16_1254129942.jpg)
sheepie
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 3029
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
- Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***
-
by firsty on Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:05 pm
the first three don't look right, by that I'm talking the post work not the actual composition/subjects not sure what they are missing, they look washed out so it could be too much fill light not enough Black needs more contrast needs more clarity or more vibrance just one may fix it or it could be a little bit of each I had a quick play with a screen capture (poor quality) ![Image](http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3189/2342249469_d0bb2c7ca0_o.jpg) looks like the main problem was the color temp was too cool raised temp then brought some blue back to sky and water using the HSL section in lightroom by lowering blue luminance, increasing saturation, and a hue shift to the right these were done by dragging on the photo with the little pointer thingy so it also affected the aqua a little as well also added recovery, a little black, contrast, clarity and vibrancy
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=1571_1200198592.jpg)
firsty
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 581
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:34 am
- Location: Baulkham Hills Sydney - D200
by rcg on Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:06 pm
I like the leading lines in the last one =)
-
rcg
- Member
-
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 3:50 pm
- Location: warrnambool
by Justin on Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:01 pm
The reds feel slightly too saturated in all of them, otherwise they are nice. Firsty has put too much yellow in tho.
Nice greens on the first one, they are tough to get.
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4 picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=647.jpg)
Justin
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
- Location: Newtown, Sydeny
-
by digifrog on Wed Mar 19, 2008 8:04 am
Everyone has a different perspective as tho what is correct colour - and no one is entirely right - no one is entirely wrong, that is the great thing about phtography - its how you see it yourself. I like both the pictures of the first shot - the one that was posted and the extra greens which were added ! Its personal preference really - unless of course the colours are way off, like you see occasionally - that is just bad !
D200, 17-55 f2.8, 50 f1.4, 80-200 2.8
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=3095_1205875650.jpg)
digifrog
- Member
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:35 am
- Location: CBD, Hobart, Tasmania 7000
by norbs on Wed Mar 19, 2008 10:05 am
What firsty said.
The 1st especially looks washed out. Go back to what ever you used to use, the results were better.
-
norbs
- Member
-
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 10:05 pm
- Location: -30.940579 144.421865
-
by johnd on Wed Mar 19, 2008 11:15 am
stubbsy wrote: I've been experimenting with my lightroom workflow and these are my first colour output now I have everyting bedded down (watermark and border done from LR too).
Hi Peter, I'd be interested to know what sort of changes you've made with your workflow. I'm looking at ways to streamline my workflow and wondering if LR will help me significantly. My current workflow is: Preview thumbs in Bridge (CS2) Open D3 NEF in Capture NX and save as tiff - I don't usually do anything more in NX than this, WB is usually fine. I used to use ACR but it doesn't understand D3 NEFs, DNG converter can read the basic D3 NEFs but doesn't do a good job of converting them (doesn't do the expeed stuff with CA) Open tiff in CS2 for usual PP, save as PSD, profiled to sRGB Then later, open PSDs and USM and save as jpg (typically 15X10 for the wall plus small one for smugmug site) I'm interested in your opinion as to where I would fit LR into this workflow and the sort of time savings I might be able to get. Cheers John
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=699.jpg)
johnd
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1342
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
- Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.
-
by Sandy Feet on Wed Mar 19, 2008 11:28 am
I think the colours give them a look like postcards from the late 60's early 70's.
Cheers Rod
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=1562.jpg)
Sandy Feet
- Member
-
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:00 pm
- Location: Cooroibah, Sunshine Coast, QLD
by stubbsy on Thu Mar 20, 2008 1:00 pm
johnd wrote:Hi Peter, I'd be interested to know what sort of changes you've made with your workflow. I'm looking at ways to streamline my workflow and wondering if LR will help me significantly. My current workflow is...
John For a few weeks now I've been intending to post some details of my Lightroom workflow - so I've just started a post to contain that. See HERE for the (preliminary) answer to your question.
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=218.gif)
stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by Oneputt on Thu Mar 20, 2008 1:06 pm
Peter I would have to say that there appears to be somthing wrong with the colours, at least on this monitor and they do look a tad oversharpened. Not what I have come to expect from you. ![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=326_1205314983.gif)
Oneputt
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3174
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
- Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.
-
by stubbsy on Thu Mar 20, 2008 1:14 pm
Thanks for all the feedback. I've just moved to a new PC and I've had some difficulties getting my monitor calibration right. I'll be looking at these images on another PC this weekend to see if they look the same. At this end the colours seem reasonably OK although the reds are pushed a little in #2 which I agree is oversharpened. Edit: Boy is my face RED. I went back and looked at these on my old PC and they looked pretty bad. I then replaced the colour profile I'd used on my new PC with the one from my old one (same monitor used). I've now redone the PP in Lightroom with the amended monitor colour profile and these appear below. OOPS! ![Image](http://stubbsy.smugmug.com/photos/268059353_qmVJN-L.jpg) ![Image](http://stubbsy.smugmug.com/photos/268055098_72k4S-L.jpg) ![Image](http://stubbsy.smugmug.com/photos/268059446_xm9aS-L.jpg) ![Image](http://stubbsy.smugmug.com/photos/268058822_FZVQt-L.jpg)
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=218.gif)
stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|