LarissaModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
LarissaI'm trying my hand at something a little different for me.
This gorgeous model is Larissa from Sudio E model agency in Hobart. The first image was taken at about 8pm on a poorly lit dock in Hobart. Taken without flash with D3, 85/1.4 set at f5.6 and 1/200 sec at ISO 6400. I was impressed with how little colour noise is in this image. Why 1/200 sec with a subject that wasn't moving? Just to see what this camera can really do at high ISO. The other images were taken earlier in the evening at Salamanca in Hobart with 85/1.4 and 24-70/2.8. Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Re: LarissaJohn, I love the first and for something not your genre you seem to have the hang of it, all are great
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
Re: LarissaLove the skin tones in #1. Great photo and nice expression from the model.
Tim
D300 | D200 | F90x | 70-200 f2.8 VR | Tamron 90 f2.8 Macro | Tokina 12-24 f4 | Sigma 18-50 f2.8 Macro | Nikon SB-800
Re: LarissaGreat set of shots mate, and she sure is a looker.
Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
Re: LarissaI like the colours in the first image
and I like the last ---> just something about it
Re: LarissaLast 3 are excellent. I love the lighting in number 2, John. Great job.
Alex
Re: LarissaJohn wow, you should do this more often, for trying something new you've pulled of some cracker shots.
The first is great, especially considering the ISO, the noise that is there certainly doesn't detract from the image.
Re: LarissaHi John,
Those are some very good shots mate, the model is gorgeous and seems completely relaxed in them. The eyes in the third picture are very striking, and the smile in the fourth picture (and for that matter the rest) doesn't seem forced like many people come up with. Benefits of a professional model I guess! Congrats on some fine shots, David Nikon D200, SB800, 18-200VR
Re: LarissaGreat work John....love #1 and #3...stunning model and your images do her justice.....awesome.
Re: Larissaoh no john, what happened...?
im sorry, but somehting looks wrong with your D3, perhaps you can send it to me to re-calibrate it for you although... umm... joking, they look great. not sure about the pyjamas outdoors, but the lighting is nice. im saving my pennies for a D3...
Re: LarissaThanks for the comments guys.
Larissa is an excellent model. She was just so professional, knowing how to work the poses for the camera. I'd say the results are 90% due to her and 9% due to the camera and equipment. I get 1% for pressing the shutter. I asked her how she learnt to work the camera so well and she told me that her and a few other models she works with have their point and shoots with them and practise all the time shooting each other and then critiquing the shots. A bit like what we do to improve our photography, but she does it to improve what goes on on her side of the lens. In #1, I really like the shot, but she was very uncomfortable. 8 o'clock at night at the waterfront in Hobart. I was rugged up but she was lying on that steel structure for 10 minutes. She is a real professional to put up with this. In #2, I like the lighting, but forgot to clone out a couple distraction (above her head, and lower RHS). Dooh. In #3, the effect I got was from softening the entire shot but sharpening and brightening the eyes. I think I might have gone too far, but I do like the result. Not realistic I admit, but nice and dreamy IMHO. #4 is probably the most interesting for me as it is the one I like the most. Normally background like the cars doesn't help the shot, but I think it has worked in this case. The 85 1.4 was wide open and I'm sure it's the creamy bokeh that has done it. I will revisit this image to see if I can PP a bit of fill onto her face. Thanks once again for all the comments. Thanks for the offer Bruce. I might ship the D3 plus glass over to you for a recalibration. Second thoughts, probably not as I need it on Sunday for another practice with a couple other models. Sorry mate. maybe next week. Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|