CandyModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
CandyI had the pleasure of shooting Candy at an outdoor location shoot this afternoon.
Candy will be the model for out portraiture workshop on Saturday. These shots here were all taken with the 50mm and 80mm 1.4 lenses and the D200..with SB800 for some fill flash. She was easy to direct and we had lots of fun. Minimal PP applied. Comments and constructive criticism welcomed: Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Re: CandyGeoff
The middle two stand out for me - nice shallow DOF but her face is nice and sharp #1 doesn't grab me (the facial expression I think) and #4 I'm distracted by the bright background) Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: CandyThanks for the constructive criticism guys, I didn't think that the bright background in no.4 distracted too much at first, but now I can see.
There's a couple more images now in the gallery; http://geoffyates.smugmug.com/gallery/4614728_EGKqV#272229915 Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Re: CandyGeoff, I agree with Peter and will add that No 2 is the pick as Candy seems to be really engaging with you and, therefore, with the viewer.
Incidentally, has your SB800/D200 misfiring been fixed? (I forget what you said in your Paraday post ) Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: CandyThanks Patrick,
Yep..the SB800 misfiring issue has been fixed! I know you know, but this was a D200 issue, not the SB800. Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|