More lighting - HeartModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
More lighting - HeartJust testing more lighting techniques with coloured gels
One light with a reflector (re: A4 piece of paper) Pretty much out of the camera. Settings: ISO 200 1/200s f16 SB800 on 1/8 power and light was modified with grid to narrow the beam Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: More lighting - HeartNo. 2 looks better as far as lighting goes. The 3D shape looks better, probably because of the way the object is positioned relative to the camera. I also like the reflection in the 2nd one. No. 1 looks a bit flat in terms of shape flat the lighting brought out. No. 2 looks a bit weired at the top as if it dented. May be it is. I think though both of them would benefit from bringing out the subject by using longer focal length or coming in closer. Perhaps also another light from the upper backside would bring out the large shadow areas at the top.
Alex
Re: More lighting - Heart
Re: More lighting - HeartThanks Alex.
Not sure what you mean by using a longer focal length though as this was already at 70mm. Agree with the side light on the left - will look into that one. Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: More lighting - Heart
Sorry for double post too. I meant the subject would benefit from being more dominant in the image, I think. I asked whether it was an egg as the heart shape is not obvious as it is small relative to the background. So I think either coming in closer or using a longer lens would help. Cheers Alex
Re: More lighting - HeartAhh gotcha. Yeah I'll fix that up with a closer crop
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: More lighting - HeartLike the reflection in the second. What was the setup used to achieve this dark look?
Re: More lighting - HeartNice shots.
You might want to be careful with the photoshopping. I can see a few of your paint brush strokes in the second shot. Daniel Nikon D4, D2Xs, D70, Nikkors and Sigmas lenses from 10 to 400mm
www.DSAimages.com
Re: More lighting - HeartThanks Daniel - joy of using a CRT screen then viewing it on LCD.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|