KatherineModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
KatherineThis is Katherine, a Hobart based model. Katherine's special talent is her attitude look.
The assignment was to do natural light images on a dull overcast day. I would appreciate critique as I'm trying to improve my portrait photography. Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Re: KatherineGreat work on the first one John. I like the unusual use of DoF. I like the last one as well.
__________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
Re: KatherineLike the last one. Not sure about the first due to distracting OOF areas.
Re: Katherinei like the effect of that foreground grill it's a mad pic
but as for portraiture i think she looks uneasy in all images unless thats a quality you want to capture in this set i'd say to improve you need to polish up your rapport with the model so she doesnt give off those morbid expressions i'm not saying smiley shots but there has to be some magic in the eyes, good expressions come from the rapport, trust between the model and phog you can't easily set up an expression it has to be part of something spontaneous Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents Press - Getty Images Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency My Book - Zeduce
Re: KatherineWendell
Juding by what John said about Katherine's "attitude look" - it being her speciality - I'd say that the look John has achieved in these shots would be exactly what he was after. John, I think your use of the light in the fourth is great. I understand what you're doing in the first, but I find the OOF foreground is a bit too distracting for my taste. Just as well my opinion doesn't matter, eh? g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: KatherineLooks Good John, You are really growing with your portraiture shots. Keep it up.
D200, 17-55 f2.8, 50 f1.4, 80-200 2.8
Re: KatherineThanks for all the comments guys.
The first image is my absolute favourite shot of the day. I love the effect of the OOF grill across her. I know she won't want this shot in her portfolio because it's obsuring her face, but I did this one for me and I am so pleased with the result. In #2, #3, she is probably putting on the "attitude" look a bit much. Again she probably won't want to use them. In #3 in particular, I think the shot says "turn off that f...ing camera before I wrap it around your skull. Which is hardly the sort of shot for a portfolio. I don't know if it's a rapport think or not Wendell. The last image was about the closest I could get to a smile. I wasn't after a cheesy grin, but it's almost like she didn't know how to smile if that makes any sense. I have many more, most full length shots to really show off her long legs and not enough close in tight shots. Must remember to get closer next time. It's all good learning though. Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Re: KatherineA model that won't smile ? Sheesh.
I actually like #1 too, it's different and effective. For #2 and #3 if she was auditioning for a part in Prisoner yeah maybe. #4 is actually my pick, I like the angle and lighting actually Darren
Nikon D3 and Nikon Glass
Re: KatherineLOVE the concept of #1, but #4 would be my pick...just feel it's a more insightful shot. For #2 & #3, I don't know...not really keen on the skewed effect.
Overall, great work...you really should convince her to add #1 on her portfolio, though!
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|