Katherine

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Katherine

Postby johnd on Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:31 pm

This is Katherine, a Hobart based model. Katherine's special talent is her attitude look.
The assignment was to do natural light images on a dull overcast day.
I would appreciate critique as I'm trying to improve my portrait photography.

Image Image
Image Image


Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Re: Katherine

Postby phillipb on Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:39 pm

Great work on the first one John. I like the unusual use of DoF. I like the last one as well.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Re: Katherine

Postby surenj on Wed Apr 16, 2008 12:23 am

Like the last one. Not sure about the first due to distracting OOF areas.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Katherine

Postby wendellt on Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:33 am

i like the effect of that foreground grill it's a mad pic

but as for portraiture
i think she looks uneasy in all images
unless thats a quality you want to capture in this set
i'd say to improve you need to polish up your rapport with the model
so she doesnt give off those morbid expressions i'm not saying smiley shots
but there has to be some magic in the eyes, good expressions come from the rapport, trust between the model and phog
you can't easily set up an expression it has to be part of something spontaneous
Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents
Press - Getty Images
Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency
My Book - Zeduce
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Re: Katherine

Postby gstark on Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:48 am

Wendell

wendellt wrote:so she doesnt give off those morbid expressions


Juding by what John said about Katherine's "attitude look" - it being her speciality - I'd say that the look John has achieved in these shots would be exactly what he was after.

John, I think your use of the light in the fourth is great.

I understand what you're doing in the first, but I find the OOF foreground is a bit too distracting for my taste. Just as well my opinion doesn't matter, eh? :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Katherine

Postby digifrog on Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:52 am

Looks Good John, You are really growing with your portraiture shots. Keep it up.
D200, 17-55 f2.8, 50 f1.4, 80-200 2.8
User avatar
digifrog
Member
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:35 am
Location: CBD, Hobart, Tasmania 7000

Re: Katherine

Postby johnd on Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:52 am

Thanks for all the comments guys.

The first image is my absolute favourite shot of the day. I love the effect of the OOF grill across her. I know she won't want this shot in her portfolio because it's obsuring her face, but I did this one for me and I am so pleased with the result.

In #2, #3, she is probably putting on the "attitude" look a bit much. Again she probably won't want to use them. In #3 in particular, I think the shot says "turn off that f...ing camera before I wrap it around your skull. Which is hardly the sort of shot for a portfolio. :wink:

I don't know if it's a rapport think or not Wendell. The last image was about the closest I could get to a smile. I wasn't after a cheesy grin, but it's almost like she didn't know how to smile if that makes any sense.

I have many more, most full length shots to really show off her long legs and not enough close in tight shots. :cry: Must remember to get closer next time. It's all good learning though.

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Re: Katherine

Postby kiwi on Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:12 am

model that won't smile ? Sheesh.

I actually like #1 too, it's different and effective. For #2 and #3 if she was auditioning for a part in Prisoner yeah maybe.

#4 is actually my pick, I like the angle and lighting actually
Darren
Nikon D3 and Nikon Glass
User avatar
kiwi
Member
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:22 pm
Location: Arana Hills, Brisbane

Re: Katherine

Postby gisellen on Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:22 pm

LOVE the concept of #1, but #4 would be my pick...just feel it's a more insightful shot. For #2 & #3, I don't know...not really keen on the skewed effect.

Overall, great work...you really should convince her to add #1 on her portfolio, though! :)
Giselle | "The camera can photograph thought." - Dirk Bogarde

redbubble | flickr
User avatar
gisellen
Newbie
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 5:48 pm
Location: Brighton-le-Sands, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques