And here we go again, banning photography...

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby bwhinnen on Thu Apr 17, 2008 1:24 pm

As pointed out to be by Joe (dodge) in todays Courier Mail.

Full article

Darren Cartwright wrote:TRAINSPOTTERS and tourists could be forcibly removed from train stations if they take photographs of "transport infrastructure" because Queensland Rail guidelines may deem it an act of terrorism.


What next?
User avatar
bwhinnen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
Location: Cornubia, Brisbane

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby Bindii on Thu Apr 17, 2008 1:58 pm

And here was just the other day happily standing on the platform at Roma Street Station snapping away... *looks behind my shoulder*...

and who are they kidding... if a terrorist is going to snap shots I hardly think they would draw attention to themselves by standing there with a 'professional looking camera'... (as they quoted).. more like it will be the guy with the mobile phone camera who is the terrorist..

*sigh*...

:)
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list... ;)
User avatar
Bindii
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: Ormeau Hills Queensland

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby photohiker on Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:00 pm

bwhinnen wrote:
What next?


Banning electronic devices on trains because they may upset the navigation systems?

Taking photos is easy to pick on because it is an obvious activity.

It's also futile to ban it, because it is so easy to record images with hidden cameras, not to mention accurately map the area with a GPS track and just walking around.

Michael
photohiker
Senior Member
 
Posts: 687
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 11:56 am
Location: Burnside, South Australia.

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby Pehpsi on Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:02 pm

Indeed.

Terrorist 1: Quick, I need a picture of that train!
Terrorist 2: Which lens do you require, master?
Terrorist 1: Hand me my 70-200VR f2.8, and this time, please leave the VR set to normal!
Terrorist 2: Yes master, as you wish..
Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR

20" iMac Intel C2D
Aperture 2.1
PS CS3

http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
User avatar
Pehpsi
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Kingsgrove, Sydney

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby Justin on Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:24 pm

You mean, they would bother? Took about 3 seconds to get... Is that Bindii snapping away down there?

Image

http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?f=q&hl=e ... 3&t=h&z=17


Or check out http://qroti.com/cgi/placeinfo.pl?Name=Roma+Street for absolutely everything you need, incl. photos!
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby photohiker on Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:47 pm

Justin,

I think Bindii was talking about this station. :)

Or the OpenStreetmap version here. (This one, you and I can alter by correcting and adding features, unlike the commercial copyrighted version on Google.)

Michael
photohiker
Senior Member
 
Posts: 687
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 11:56 am
Location: Burnside, South Australia.

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby Reschsmooth on Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:49 pm

Why don't you Brisbanites arrange a meet at a station and cause some public mischief by pulling out your "professional looking" cameras and start firing away! :twisted: See what kind of response you get?
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby Justin on Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:50 pm

hahahaha

I am killing myself laughing. I'd make a godawful terrorist, i'll stick to photography and riding my bike!

Who woulda thought
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby photohiker on Thu Apr 17, 2008 3:07 pm

I wouldn't have picked up the difference myself if I hadn't been there recently. It's got a thumpin great roof over it.

Michael
photohiker
Senior Member
 
Posts: 687
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 11:56 am
Location: Burnside, South Australia.

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby Greg B on Thu Apr 17, 2008 4:58 pm

We were in Spain last year, and I took a bunch of photos in and around one of the main Madrid stations.

And you might recall that they have actually had terrorist bombings on trains in Madrid, but were they
worried about me taking photos? Of course not.

I think that in Australia (and there are similar regulations in Victoria to those in Queensland, probably
NSW too) there is a combination of wanting to appear to be doing something, regardless of how pointless
it might be, and the desire by some low level officials to exercise their ill gotten power.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby Bindii on Thu Apr 17, 2008 6:09 pm

Justin wrote:You mean, they would bother? Took about 3 seconds to get... Is that Bindii snapping away down there?



Thats my Sony side dammit! :P
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list... ;)
User avatar
Bindii
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: Ormeau Hills Queensland

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby Willy wombat on Thu Apr 17, 2008 6:15 pm

Seems they have to throw the security gorillas a bananna every now and then to keep them from getting bored.

What a joke.
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby zafra52 on Thu Apr 17, 2008 7:22 pm

As Greg B pointed out

And you might recall that they have actually had terrorist bombings on trains in Madrid, but were they worried about me taking photos?


I was also in Spain taking pictures last year and nobody gave it a second thought, but here in Australia we are starting to share the paranoia, phobias, and prejudice of our big cousin the United States forgetting how liveable and tolerant our society can be. Like some of you have already stated, a terrorist like the spies in the old movies would be more likely to use some kind of simple, freely available, and undetectable gadget; not a cumbersome large camera fitted with a big lens.

Our illustrious leaders and bureaucrats seem oblivious to the fact that terrorist are not born, but made with unfair laws, prejudice and victimisation like in "The Constant Gardener". I think it is time we stop allowing them to violate our individual and civil rights. But again, I am preaching to the converted. :violin:
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby surenj on Thu Apr 17, 2008 7:45 pm

We should have a minimeet to see what would happen if a large group of photogs started snapping away in Central station. I reckon we could get away withit if we made ourselves offical looking badges stating that we are the press or something....
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby matt-chops on Thu Apr 17, 2008 11:07 pm

Reschsmooth wrote:Why don't you Brisbanites arrange a meet at a station and cause some public mischief by pulling out your "professional looking" cameras and start firing away! :twisted: See what kind of response you get?

I'm in. I love mischief.
Matt

Canon 5DmkII + Grip | Canon 400D + Grip | 17-40 f/4 L USM | 24-105 f/4 L IS USM | 70-200 f/2.8 L IS USM | 2 x 580 EX II | Manfrotto Stabilizing Stuff
User avatar
matt-chops
Member
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 8:25 pm
Location: Southside, Brisbane

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby Pehpsi on Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:48 am

I don't take pics of planes anymore because they made me feel like shite..
Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR

20" iMac Intel C2D
Aperture 2.1
PS CS3

http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
User avatar
Pehpsi
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Kingsgrove, Sydney

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby Grev on Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:45 am

I think the terrorist population in Australia just increased by a few (hundred) folds if every person that takes a photo is a terrorist.
Blog: http://grevgrev.blogspot.com
Deviantart: http://grebbin.deviantart.com

Nikon: D700 / D70 / AiS 28mm f2 / AiS 35mm f1.4 / AiS 50mm f1.2 / AiS 180mm f2.8 ED / AFD 85mm f1.4 / Sigma 50mm f1.4 / Sigma 24-70 f2.8 macro / Mamiya 80mm f1.9 x2 /Mamiya 120mm f4 macro
User avatar
Grev
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1025
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:10 pm
Location: 4109, Brisbane.

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby bwhinnen on Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:14 am

surenj wrote:We should have a minimeet to see what would happen if a large group of photogs started snapping away in Central station. I reckon we could get away withit if we made ourselves offical looking badges stating that we are the press or something....


In the article a member of the press was asked to delete photos, so I guess us stating we are press won't really help all that much :P
User avatar
bwhinnen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
Location: Cornubia, Brisbane

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby Bindii on Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:33 am

matt-chops wrote:
Reschsmooth wrote:Why don't you Brisbanites arrange a meet at a station and cause some public mischief by pulling out your "professional looking" cameras and start firing away! :twisted: See what kind of response you get?

I'm in. I love mischief.


Me too..

but only if someone brings food.. :mrgreen:
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list... ;)
User avatar
Bindii
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: Ormeau Hills Queensland

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby Big Red on Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:33 am

This Link is to a card you can keep with your gear [make a spare copy to give to the person who harrasses you :mrgreen: ] but it is American based ...

http://www.krages.com/ThePhotographersRight.pdf

is there anything like this available in Australia ?
User avatar
Big Red
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2520
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Jacobs Well Qld ... mossie capital of the world

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby MCWB on Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:36 am

Big Red wrote:is there anything like this available in Australia ?

For NSW: http://www.4020.net/words/photorights.php#infosheet
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby Raskill on Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:43 am

A few have mentioned Madrid, and how, rightly so, the Spanish don't give a hoot if you take photos. But, would you agree about a ban if there WAS a terror attack on rail infrastructure?

Just curious.

Personally, I think this is a joke. No terrorist is going to be using professional looking equipment, and as has been pointed out, there is plenty of images and info on the net anyway. I agree that low/mid level public servants tend to like to be seen to do things, and this is likely such a case.

On government owned infrstructure you'd be right to be pissed at such rules, in privately owned shopping centres, it's their right to make the mot draconian of laws if they wish.

By the way, don't rely on google earth if you are a terrorist. They edit/change/delete etc maps when requested to by governments.
2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc

http://www.awbphotos.com.au
User avatar
Raskill
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2161
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:26 pm
Location: Rockley, near Bathurst, Home of Aussie Motorsport!

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby photohiker on Fri Apr 18, 2008 11:24 am

I think it's a case of the genie is well and truly out of the bottle, and there is no way of putting it back.

Terrorists either are members of the public, or masquerading as same. They can walk around and plan whatever deed they intend to do as they like, and I think in the London attacks, that is exactly what they did. We can't move the traintracks and railway stations, nor can we shield them from the public eyes, hidden cameras and electronics.

Whatever the expected outcome of this silliness, at best it will reduce the noticeable photography, but it wont alter the risk one little bit.

Google Maps/Earth are probably not where terrorists go for their information in any case, and governments would be interested in hiding security infrastructure, not railway stations.

Anyway, they have it all wrong. I watched a DVD the other day that told me that downloading movies funds terrorism, so it's not the photographers they should be chasing. :)

Michael
photohiker
Senior Member
 
Posts: 687
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 11:56 am
Location: Burnside, South Australia.

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby Matt. K on Sat Apr 19, 2008 6:44 pm

I believe there are no such laws in NSW and you are free to photograph on railway stations and in trains.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby the foto fanatic on Sat Apr 19, 2008 11:25 pm

Queensland Rail has been forced into an embarrassing backdown as a result of the publicity surrounding this story. They have now stated that there is no problem with photography at railway stations. But they do recommend that you contact the stationmaster first.

It never fails to amuse me how, when you give some people a uniform, they turn into little Hitlers.

And, of course, handing out a ticket with a fine attached is bound to prevent any terrorist from committing his heinous acts. :roll:
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby wazonthehill2 on Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:07 am

It certainly surprising what can happen when you pull out a camera
I recently had to attend a one hour meeting in Perth (?!) and was tired and bored on the train back from Sydney to Newcastle, so sitting in the seat taking pictures out the window (along section west of Lake Macquarie). Things to photograph out the window are , tree, hill, fence, creek, like wow.
Then along comes a ticket checker in the train.
Ticket officer "what are you doing sir"
me "going home"
Ticket officer "why do you have a camera"
me "to take photos"
Ticket officer "Why are you taking photos"
me "because I am bored, at least Quantas had in flight movies (travel bag sitting there with Qantas tags on it)
me " here is my ticket"
ticket officer "what are you taking pictures of"
me "trees, hills, stuff, I am bored and I do not think they mind" (long long stare)
Ticket officer moves off down the stairs and meets offsider who had been checking the lower section of the carriage. They then proceeded to have a long discussion (in my ear shot but not sight, of what they should do with me). They did not come back!
whizzzz, there goes life again.....
But now captured on a Canon 40D with bits

http://www.flickr.com/photos/wazonthehill/
User avatar
wazonthehill2
Member
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Valentine Newcastle NSW Australia

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby Grev on Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:30 am

Bindii wrote:
matt-chops wrote:
Reschsmooth wrote:Why don't you Brisbanites arrange a meet at a station and cause some public mischief by pulling out your "professional looking" cameras and start firing away! :twisted: See what kind of response you get?

I'm in. I love mischief.


Me too..

but only if someone brings food.. :mrgreen:

Let's terrorise together. :D
Blog: http://grevgrev.blogspot.com
Deviantart: http://grebbin.deviantart.com

Nikon: D700 / D70 / AiS 28mm f2 / AiS 35mm f1.4 / AiS 50mm f1.2 / AiS 180mm f2.8 ED / AFD 85mm f1.4 / Sigma 50mm f1.4 / Sigma 24-70 f2.8 macro / Mamiya 80mm f1.9 x2 /Mamiya 120mm f4 macro
User avatar
Grev
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1025
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:10 pm
Location: 4109, Brisbane.

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby aim54x on Fri May 09, 2008 1:44 pm

Pehpsi wrote:Indeed.

Terrorist 1: Quick, I need a picture of that train!
Terrorist 2: Which lens do you require, master?
Terrorist 1: Hand me my 70-200VR f2.8, and this time, please leave the VR set to normal!
Terrorist 2: Yes master, as you wish..
 LOL!!!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby aim54x on Fri May 09, 2008 1:47 pm

surenj wrote:We should have a minimeet to see what would happen if a large group of photogs started snapping away in Central station. I reckon we could get away withit if we made ourselves offical looking badges stating that we are the press or something....


oh we should so do it!!!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: And here we go again, banning photography...

Postby aim54x on Fri May 09, 2008 1:53 pm

Matt. K wrote:I believe there are no such laws in NSW and you are free to photograph on railway stations and in trains.


Well i was taking some shots over at Circular Quay station not so long ago, and was told that I was not allowed to, and that I had to go downstairs and get permission from the station master, which I did, but i am not sure if there is legal ground behind this.
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney


Return to General Discussion