Holiday Snaps #1Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Holiday Snaps #1The wharf at Merimbula, very high up off the water, popular with anglers. Comments welcome Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
Hi Greg - I'm trying to work out what I don't like about this image. It just doesn't do it for me I'm afraid.
Perhaps it's a tad over sharpened? I'm trying in my mind to picture a crop I'd like better too - perhaps less of the foreground (although I understand this is the main subject!). I do like the concept, but (to me anyway) it doesn't quite work. Just scrolling down now to have another look, and the view I get does work for me - a crop about four or five widths of timber down from the chair. Makes it more a pano, and I like the result. Hope I'm not being too harsh! Regards *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
Good points. Thanks sheepie, and mceiw. Version 2, I think it is an improvement. I have it in mind to do a BW conversion, just leaving the chair red. Probably a bit cliched, but I won't let that stop me Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
A definite improvement Greg, I probably would have gone just a touch more with the cropping, then you would have equal thirds for symmetry between the white sandy line and the black wharf line.
__________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
Second version is certainly better Greg. Love the red chair and I would be inclined to clone out the boat - would make for a masterpiece in understatement
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Interesting idea to clone out the boat. That may do it for me as well. I don't think that you should make it completely BW with a red chair, but desaturate it somewhat while leaving the red chair as it is, a little more subtle and not quite, as you say, cliche.
How about this version?
A combination rule of thirds and neat-and-in-the-middle. All it needs now is a brick wall and a duck. Cheers Dean I intend to live forever. So far, so good.
D2x | Nikkor 24-120vr & 50/1.8 | Sigma 12-24 & 24-70/2.8 & 70-200/2.8 | SB800 | Velbon 640CF Tripod w/ Markins M10 & RRS plates. And then there's my Bag Collection... Sweeet....;-)
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|