Bee!Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Bee!Okay i did already post this half way down some other post...but here it is again for critique.
So far I've found macro (using reversed 50mm) to be very difficult. I put this shot down mostly to luck combined with the probability that I'd have to get at least one good shot if I fired > 50 shots while the bee was running and buzzing around. This was the only shot worth keeping. Is the cropping okay? I'm now thinking that perhaps I should remove much of the left section right up to the wing. D90, 50 mm 1.8, 18-70 mm, Sigma 10-20 mm, SB600
Re: Bee!This macro lark is not as easy as it looks is it?.. still you've done a good job of it although I feel it could be sharper overall... I'd crop to where you suggested also...
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
Re: Bee!Are you referring specifically to the 'reversed 50mm' lark?
I've found it very difficult to get good images with the reversed 50mm. The DOF is so narrow, there's often not enough of it to go around. That being said, I do see potential for capturing some great images. In fact I can't actually remember if I was stopped down to f22 or only close to it. Perhaps I could have squeezed a bit more depth out of it. I might have a hunt around and see what other people have managed with these tools. Cheers. D90, 50 mm 1.8, 18-70 mm, Sigma 10-20 mm, SB600
Re: Bee!a reversed 50mm is very difficult to use, much harder than a dedicated macro lens. @f22 you are suffering from quite a bit of diffraction which isnt helping your sharpness. i'd be considering using a flash next time round. you'll get much sharper images.
bees are really tough to get right, especially at that focal length. all things considered you did a great job. EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
Re: Bee!When reversing lenses I found reversing a 50mm on the front of another lens (105 or 70-300G) gave ok results.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|