Tokina 11-16mm f2.8

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Tokina 11-16mm f2.8

Postby chrisk on Mon May 05, 2008 11:56 am

Tokina trumps OEM again. this looks like a pearler of a WA lens. looks to have excelletn performance, (apart from typical tokina CA), and is priced beautifully.
http://www.photozone.de/Reviews/Canon%2 ... 6_28_canon

2.8 aperture aswell no less ! this is high on my list.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Re: Tokina 11-16mm f2.8

Postby Yi-P on Thu May 08, 2008 11:04 pm

How much is one of this? Sounds like a budget fast wide angle for the DX bodies :)
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Re: Tokina 11-16mm f2.8

Postby the foto fanatic on Fri May 09, 2008 7:34 am

I'm sure it's a good lens, but what about that piddling zoom range? :?:

I think I'd prefer a fast prime.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Re: Tokina 11-16mm f2.8

Postby Grev on Fri May 09, 2008 7:50 am

I was thinking of getting it, haven't seen any fixed focal length lenses go that wide yet (except for the Sigma 10-20 and fisheyes) and I don't use ultra wides that much to justify the Nikon 14-24...

Well vignetting, distortion and resolution might be worse on the Nikon because of the slightly bigger sensor and I think Tokina cares a bit more about Canon than Nikon in that regards (re Tokina 12-24).
Blog: http://grevgrev.blogspot.com
Deviantart: http://grebbin.deviantart.com

Nikon: D700 / D70 / AiS 28mm f2 / AiS 35mm f1.4 / AiS 50mm f1.2 / AiS 180mm f2.8 ED / AFD 85mm f1.4 / Sigma 50mm f1.4 / Sigma 24-70 f2.8 macro / Mamiya 80mm f1.9 x2 /Mamiya 120mm f4 macro
User avatar
Grev
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1025
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:10 pm
Location: 4109, Brisbane.

Re: Tokina 11-16mm f2.8

Postby chrisk on Sat May 10, 2008 11:18 am

what fast prime would you be able to get in that range ? the 14mm nikkor is double the price and its a pretty big/ heavy lens so its not like you'll be saving on weight/size like you do with say the 50, 28, or 35mm primes.

looks like it will be around the $750 mark. imo its great value for people who want a landscape zoom lens and with that kind of sharpness its a great WA portrait lens.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Re: Tokina 11-16mm f2.8

Postby sirhc55 on Sat May 10, 2008 11:30 am

Rooz wrote:what fast prime would you be able to get in that range ? the 14mm nikkor is double the price and its a pretty big/ heavy lens so its not like you'll be saving on weight/size like you do with say the 50, 28, or 35mm primes.

looks like it will be around the $750 mark. imo its great value for people who want a landscape zoom lens and with that kind of sharpness its a great WA portrait lens.


:agree:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Re: Tokina 11-16mm f2.8

Postby the foto fanatic on Sat May 10, 2008 11:51 am

Rooz wrote:what fast prime would you be able to get in that range ? the 14mm nikkor is double the price and its a pretty big/ heavy lens so its not like you'll be saving on weight/size like you do with say the 50, 28, or 35mm primes.

looks like it will be around the $750 mark. imo its great value for people who want a landscape zoom lens and with that kind of sharpness its a great WA portrait lens.


I understand what you are saying.

But I wonder why Tokina didn't make (say) a 12mm or a 16mm prime. Surely that would have been easier and cheaper. I just think that a 5mm zoom range is a tad ridiculous, even at the wide end.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane


Return to General Discussion