Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by chrisk on Wed May 14, 2008 3:47 pm
there is something not quite right with this shot. i think its the colours or the WB ?? the bird colour itself is spot on in isolation but something is still not right. maybe the green background is throwing me off...too dark ?? the hues ?? is it giving an olive-y cast to the whole shot ?? i thought he looked bizarre in the frame here. looks like a half-man half bird the way he's posed. i've tried different crops of the same shot and they all look crap. i mean this should be a good shot. but it's not. i want to go back and reshoot this guy but not until i figure out how to get the best out of the situation. ideas would be appreciated. 
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by sirhc55 on Wed May 14, 2008 4:00 pm
Looks fine on my calibrated monitor 
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by W00DY on Wed May 14, 2008 4:06 pm
I wouldn't say the shot sucks... I would be pretty pleased with it. I am no bird photographer and don't even really like looking at them (but I don't hate them  ) but I think it is the angle for me. Maybe if you were slightly to the right more with a more side on profile it might work a little better? Do you think? To me the beck (sp?) lining up with the birds frame is a bit off putting. But as I said I am no bird lover so what do I know 
Andrew Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
-

W00DY
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
- Location: Sydney - Hills District
-
by Bugeyes on Wed May 14, 2008 5:06 pm
A dark bird on a light background, light bird on a dark background? Maybe a different composition and angle?  
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I have my doubts about the former.
....Albert Einstein
-

Bugeyes
- Member
-
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 10:47 pm
- Location: Runcorn, Brisbane
by dawesy on Wed May 14, 2008 5:20 pm
Honestly I think it's just the direction he is looking. If he was looking more to camera left so you only saw one side of his face I suspect you'd be more pleased. I certainly think it would be stronger. For mine there is not really a big technical issue here so it's just down to the pose of the bird. Only way to improve on that is to keep getting the technical bits right and shoot it repeatedly!
-
dawesy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:44 pm
- Location: Roseville, Sydney
-
by wendellt on Wed May 14, 2008 5:23 pm
i liketh etones and the green background all the tones they work in harmony
the issue is the compsoition for this bird i think a portrait dead centre composition would of presented the subject better
its an eagle they are tall full of confidence a portrait comp would of obviously suited it better
about the existing crop the subject is not centred theres a wasted space to the left that draws the eye no contextual element in that space so its wasted space and i think this is what weakens the composition
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by phillipb on Wed May 14, 2008 5:32 pm
I think it's both the crop and the dark background, if I couldn't re-shoot, I would probably do this... 
__________ Phillip
**Nikon D7000**
-

phillipb
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2599
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
- Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**
by chrisk on Wed May 14, 2008 6:05 pm
thansk for all the advice. that helps alot. thanks for rubbing it in with those great shots bugeyes. lol phillip thats already a big improvement. how did you do that ? is that using layers ? if so, how do you lighten just that one bit of it ?
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by phillipb on Wed May 14, 2008 6:23 pm
Yep, just layered, selected the background and used the levels adjustment slider to lighten it.
__________ Phillip
**Nikon D7000**
-

phillipb
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2599
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
- Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**
by Bugeyes on Wed May 14, 2008 6:52 pm
Not trying to rub it in or show you up there Rooz, just trying give you a couple of ideas with composition, you really need to be on top of your game when shooting these critters, there just like kids... they don't take direction and are some what unpredictable. You also don't get much time to work with them unless you have a season pass, so if you go back there, try and have a few shots all ready taken in your minds eye before you get the camera out of its bag. I'm not a big fan of the square on portrait, but if you do try it, make sure you have sufficient DOF for the beak and eyes to be in focus. Here are a couple more examples...   Regards, Mike.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I have my doubts about the former.
....Albert Einstein
-

Bugeyes
- Member
-
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 10:47 pm
- Location: Runcorn, Brisbane
by hamster on Wed May 14, 2008 7:41 pm
I'd like to say your shot "sucks" because it's taken in the wrong orientation. That was the first thing that jumped out at me
-
hamster
- Member
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:19 am
- Location: Parramatta, Sydney
by bwhinnen on Wed May 14, 2008 8:17 pm
I like the shot as is, but I think what may be annoying you and giving you the man-bird thing is the shadow under the beak. It takes away from the glorious curved beak of this raptor. To me the depth is lost on the shadow.
Just my thoughts. But I like it as it is personally...
-

bwhinnen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
- Location: Cornubia, Brisbane
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|