LadybugModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
LadybugThis is a shot that I took with my D40x with the 18-135mm DX lens. It has long been one of my favorites so I guess it is time to get a wider opinion of what people think. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Nikon D40x + Nikkor AF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 DX 200 ISO, 1/250 sec, f/5.6, no flash, 135mm focal length This is straight out of camera, only been watermarked and resized. Thanks for looking. Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: LadybugThe composition and flowers look great- good lighting and out of focus elements- but leaves me wanting to see the ladybug in more detail. Maybe a tighter square crop to show the bug a little better?
Robert Robert
EOS 5D Mk II, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200f4 IS, 50 f1.8, 100 macro, 300D (IR Mod)
Re: LadybugI agree with Robert that if the subject is the lady bug, it needs to be featured bigger and sharper to draw the viewers eye.
Re: LadybugLovely lighting,and the subject is great, but we need to see it taking up more of the frame.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Re: LadybugThanks guys!
Maybe I should crop it!!! A bigger bug would be really nice. I couldn't have gotten more magnification with that lens, it was already at 135mm and minimum focal distance. Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: LadybugI like the composition of the photo. It's the flowers and the bug.
Also, the bug appears to be a little out of focus? D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
Re: LadybugI think it is, and I know why!
I was holding the camera in one hand and then holding the flower, so it would fall under the light of the sun with my other hand. Not a good combination! Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|