Dark SunsetsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: Dark SunsetsI really like #2, can't say why though.
Normally I wouldn't say that much negative space would work, but I like the graduation of colour into the sunset. I also really like the way everything on land is silhouetted and the falloff left to right. That sounds like I can say why I like it really doesn't it?
Re: Dark SunsetsToo dark for me ... so in another language, photos are underexposed without any reason, so Try again
Re: Dark SunsetsAn interesting response. When I shot these it was with the express purpose of correctly exposing darkness to the extent that you couldn't just look at them and see everything. In much the same way as you need to let you eyes become accustomed to the darkness in order to see through it. The idea was to stay with the images longer to mimic that expirence. I do not thing any of them are underexposed at all. Just different from what you expect. In much the same why that High Key images aren't overexposed, It is a study of light, shadow and darkness.
Re: Dark SunsetsLow key and hi Key working well with portarait and not neccesary with landscape, but how you say - this is a artistic vision so if this was your intence, everything working well
Re: Dark SunsetsI like the mood that these images portray........ nice work
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Re: Dark SunsetsHi Nigell, you got some really interesting results there, its always good to experiment never know what you might come away with. I like the second one a lot with all the fine but recognisable details along the coast. I was wondering though, in terms of getting the darker result could you have simply jsut underexposed, or where you going for longer exposures as well? Either way some fine work
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|