Old Edits of New Pictures (NSFW)Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Old Edits of New Pictures (NSFW)... or is it the other way around?
Here are some pics i had a look at again, and armed with a better understanding of color, contrast and exposure have edited again. C&C encouraged. Matty MattyO
mattyo@mattyo.com.au http://www.mattyo.com.au WA Contributer for Circlework.com.au - Motorsports and Events Photography http://www.circlework.com.au CAMS Accreditated D300, D200, 300 f2.8 VR, 70-200 f2.8 VR, 17-55 f2.8, 1.4x, 1.7x, SB800, SB600
Re: Old Edits of New Pictures (NSFW)Matty,
You may want to add a link back to the original threads where these first appeared, so that those who so desire may compare the before and after variants. On these, and in particular #s 2 and 3, I think you should pull back on your sharpening; these two look to me to be oversharpened. Cheers. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Old Edits of New Pictures (NSFW)these look great to me ... but i may be slightly affected by the content.
#1 really takes my fancy with the pose, composition, colour, and light. Shane
Life's too short to be sad ! http://bigred4x4.blogspot.com/2008/01/welcome.html http://bigred.redbubble.com
Re: Old Edits of New Pictures (NSFW)gary,
what makes you say they are oversharpened? i am unsure if i even applied and sharpening in PP... just good nikon glass MattyO
mattyo@mattyo.com.au http://www.mattyo.com.au WA Contributer for Circlework.com.au - Motorsports and Events Photography http://www.circlework.com.au CAMS Accreditated D300, D200, 300 f2.8 VR, 70-200 f2.8 VR, 17-55 f2.8, 1.4x, 1.7x, SB800, SB600
Re: Old Edits of New Pictures (NSFW)Oh what fun going back over your 318 posts Matt to find the originals to compare to. I only found 1 and 4 and yes I definitely like the improvement in your processing. As for Gary's comment on oversharpening in 2 & 3, I can't find originals and don't really see too much evidence of oversharpening at the posted size -- though she really does jump off the page. Maybe you just had the DOF absolutely spot on.
I do like the subject though!?!
Re: Old Edits of New Pictures (NSFW)
Image two: look at her rh shoulder, from the shoulder blade to where her arm intersects with her back. There is minor evidence of haloing here, as well along the rear section of her right leg, from the buttocks and down, following the rear of her leg as we can see it. The forward section of her right thigh, too, shows evidence of haloing. The inside of her left arm, adjacent to her bra ... Image three: as well as those similar places, pay paricular attention to the inside of her right leg, just above where it meets the water. There is some very evident haloing here, going pretty well almost all the way along this part of her leg. What I'm seeing is not Nikon glass artefacts, but coming from somewhere in post, or the in-camera settings are a bit too heavy. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|