red flower fieldModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
red flower fieldafter a slow process of leaning how to get the most out of photomatix and photoshop i have come up with this which i am really quite happy with. HDR using two raw images tone mapped in photomatix then adjusted curves locally in photoshop.
if u have a big monitor, please follow this link to view larger http://flickr.com/photos/nathanjphoto/2706681312/sizes/o/ any C&C is always appreciated. thanks for looking. Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
Re: red flower fieldCrop off about 2 thirds of the sky (pano format) and its a cracker!
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
Re: red flower fieldNice shot Nathan what lens did you use for that
Ben Yu
D300,SB800,Sigma 10-20,Mini Trekker Classic,Nova 3,Ixus 55 Other toys coming very soon..stayed tuned !!!! Check out my site http://byu88.smugmug.com<>http://photobucket.com/byu88
Re: red flower fieldlovely photo well done but I agree with Bindii cut done on sky to just above dark cloud
Honi soit qui mal y pense
camera Olympus sp550 uz
Re: red flower fieldagreed, it really does work well. lens used was the almighty sigma 10-20, my fav lens
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
Re: red flower fieldAwesome..especially if it's just two exposures. What was your workflow ( I find it hard to use photomatix - too technical somewhat and the results are all substandard..)
Re: red flower field
At first i disagreed with this, I was thinking the image was quite good as it is, however after seeing the cropped version it appears to really work well. For me the cropped version really pulls your eyes to the apex of the picture where the dark cloud is, this exaggerated in the crop version more. After going back to look at the original image, extra amount of blue sky pulls me away from the apex and from the leading lines of the flower rows.... I am probably just spinning sh*% or stating the bleeding obvious here but thats the impression I got! nice call on the crop....and nice picture.. gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: red flower fieldLovely image. I was impressed by the original, but the crop was something I never would have picked but seems so obvious after it is done! I have to work on that.
Ant. D90 | D50 | Tamron 17-50 2.8| AF-S 18-55 DX (and VR) | Sigma 70 - 300 APO DG | 50mm 1.8 | SB-600
Re: red flower fieldgreat work NJ - the re-crop works very well.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: red flower fieldthanks guys
work flow is all all RAW converted to DNG files. fed two DNGs into photomatix, played with tone mapping until i got something reasonable, then opened the image in photoshop and used layer masks over the sky and the foreground to adjusted curves for the different areas of the image independently. Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|