first run with 300 2.8Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
first run with 300 2.8My first outing using a 300 2.8 AF-S II recently acquired while the $ was doing well. It's heavy but worth it IMO.
I really enjoy doing my sons footy pics and hope one day to progress to doing this a bit more seriously Getting colours and lighting consistent and really sharp pics is what I need advice on so any feedback and CC welcome. thanks for looking R2
Re: first run with 300 2.8Like the intensity in #1, and the blurred BG from shallow DOF. Good work.
Re: first run with 300 2.8R2,
great lens you got there, you will love it the more you use it. Great photos showing a lot of intensity. I'm no expert but that won't stop me from giving you advice #1: just a bit more DOF would have been nice, the boy in the back is just slightly starting to be OOF. The ball in the shot would have been nice but not really required with all the intensity you captured. #2: A bit more space on the right and a better background would have been nicer #3: spot on this is my favourite Looking forward to more, André Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
Re: first run with 300 2.8Thanks Andre and Shakey -I appreciate the specific feedback.
First time round I just wanted to see what images I would get leaving it on AP @2.8 and seeing what speeds, colours, DOF resulted trusting the lens to do the work close up - instead of cropping later - is one key area I have to work on. Eliminating crappy backgrounds - always a challenge cheers R2
Re: first run with 300 2.8Great use of what looks like an awesome lens. Very good, textbook tackle in No 2 - looks like he is dragging the opponent sideways instead of forward and into the back. Good pinning of the arms. Sydney Swans fans would have yelled "ball!!" straight away with that one!
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|