Shipwreck off StocktonModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Shipwreck off StocktonI took a lot of photos of this shipwreck off Stockton Beach when I was there four-wheel-driving a few months ago. When I got home I found it hard to identify the best ones. Which of these 3 do you like the most?
Latch
Nikon F50, D70, D200 ; Nikkor 35-80 D, 18-70 DX, 70-300 G, 50 f1.4D ; Manfrotto 190XproB tripod More about me: http://lachlan.rogers.name Some of my personal favourites: http://www.redbubble.com/people/latch
Re: Shipwreck off Stockton........ you need to straighten the horizon on all 3.....
1....... good with wave action 2....... good with the reflection in the sand 3....... good with lots of space, but I would crop out the sand at the bottom....... Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Re: Shipwreck off StocktonNumber three is the pick for me. The extra sky gives me a feeling of isolation.
Adam
Re: Shipwreck off Stocktonhey great shots ....one thing i would have shot these landscape style....with the boat bottom left of the image, then burnt the sky
Re: Shipwreck off StocktonThe wreck of the Sygna is a difficult subject to photograph and you've done well with these, but, like Dan, I'd have preferred this in landscape. Of the three here the third with the darker more polarised sky is my pick
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: Shipwreck off StocktonThanks for your comments.
I find that shooting a perfectly straight horizon like the sea makes it very tricky to get it flat - I had my camera on continuous shooting mode and took strings of shots with slight variations in angle so that at least one of them would be close to horizontal. I think I went with the portrait orientation in the first two shots to get more of the close wave and sand detail into the shot, but I don't know why I didn't try a landscape orientation for the more zoomed out third shot. Looking at them now, I agree that the extra space in the sky of the third shot emphasises the feeling of isolation. Latch
Nikon F50, D70, D200 ; Nikkor 35-80 D, 18-70 DX, 70-300 G, 50 f1.4D ; Manfrotto 190XproB tripod More about me: http://lachlan.rogers.name Some of my personal favourites: http://www.redbubble.com/people/latch
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|