Featherdale Wildlife ParkModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Featherdale Wildlife Parkman, it was hard picking just 4 pictures from this morning....
Thanks for organising the meet, we really enjoyed the morning out, I would have not otherwise been taking pictures! Thankyou also for the BBQ! Peter was definitely right, this is the place to go to get up close and personal with animals! Anyway these are 4 that I feel encapsulated the experience for me, very very hard to pick just 4!! I really need a floss, help me out pal.... gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Featherdale Wildlife ParkI quite like the 3rd shot very detailed of its skins tone hehehe
Ben Yu
D300,SB800,Sigma 10-20,Mini Trekker Classic,Nova 3,Ixus 55 Other toys coming very soon..stayed tuned !!!! Check out my site http://byu88.smugmug.com<>http://photobucket.com/byu88
Re: Featherdale Wildlife ParkGerald
Of these I prefer the last two, but generally I find these all a little too tightly cropped. The first one in particular could benefit from a little more space to emphasise the menace in those pointy teeth & powerful jaw and give a little better sense of scale. The third image is a great capture given the extremely low light in the reptile pavilion and to me is the onbly image where the cropping strengthens the image. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: Featherdale Wildlife ParkI'm going to agree with Peter on the first, but go a different way on the second.
The first loses something because it's too tightly cropped. There is no, as Peter suggests, sense of scale, and the DoF here is muddied around the top of the head where we lose clarity of where the head ends and the body lies. And while I like the direct, head on angle that you've taken, I again think that this creates an issue with a lack of delineation of where the head ends. In the second, I think I might like to see a tighter crop, protait mode, and some vignetting applied to help to try to isolate Skippy's head. The problem we are facing here is the strong side-lighting though, which has thrown half of the animal into the dark (is this the new premier of NSW?) and that creates an issue of dynamic range and contrast. We probably need a bit of dodging on the face to lighten up the shadowed side, along with some burning to darken (slightly) the illuminated side, and then come back to the cropping and vignetting that I suggested. The cropping should also remove the Johnnie Howard (aka unwanted intrusion) from the right foreground of this image. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Featherdale Wildlife Parkfirstly, thanks for the feedback, thats the kind of constructive feedback I enjoy.
ta, its actually part of what i was trying to do, i think...also trying to get some patterns there as well... this one was at iso1000 so i was pretty happy with it.
I had the idea I wanted to be as up close and personal as I could get since most of my animals shots struggle to get the reach, I did not PP crop any of my pictures so I really should have shuffled my feet (or stepped away from teh glass!) a bit more on the day to get some more angle
point taken..
I now know what that means
I agree that emu's ass is not really helping this picture , now about bringing out some light on the dark side, I have have since tried that but really struggled to get a decent amount of detail back. I have not lost any shadow detail (according to NX) so I find that a bit surprising. Cropping I can do, and it definitely removes johnnie but not sure about how to add some vignetting - let me read up on this and I will have aother crack..... again, thanks for the feedback.... gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Featherdale Wildlife ParkI kinda think I made it worse, but I gave it a go....
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|