PanosModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
PanosHi Just want a few opinions on a few panoramas, would like to know what people think between the pathway ones, the vertical or the horizontal? when doing pano i allways stick to the 3:1 ratio, i dont like LOOOOOOONG thin panorams sorry they are longer than 800pix long, will keep them smaller next time
Chris Last edited by Chazman1981 on Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: PanosI am guessing its cut abit of my pano off cause its longer than 800px
Re: PanosVertical for me, but I especially like the 3rd image.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: Panos
Which is why you should resize it. At the moment, it does not permit your image to be viewed fully, and thus there will not be too many comments. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Panosthe 2 horizontal panos have been adjusted to 800px wide
Re: PanosI like the third, its a different use of pano- detail instead of trying to fit more of in. Got me thinking and hopefully seeing differently!
Robert Robert
EOS 5D Mk II, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200f4 IS, 50 f1.8, 100 macro, 300D (IR Mod)
Re: PanosI like the vertical and the detail #3.
Craig
Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
Re: Panos...... I am with Ozi....... and I do like them long........
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|