Animal photos part 1Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Animal photos part 1Hi guys (and the small contingent of girls ), just finished doing some PP work on a few animal photos i've done over the last year or so, and was hoping to get some CC. I like the koala one asleep but am a bit bummed that i didn't get a wider shot to show the whole tree.
Don't go easy on me though
Re: Animal photos part 1What is it you are trying to achieve by these images? Without knowing that it is difficult to provide a critique as I don't know if you have achieved what you wanted. As straight nature photographs they are OK, but the vignetting detracts from the images. The shots are all quite "dark" - both in appearance but also in mood. Is that what you wanted?
Previous topic • Next topic
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|