Brisbane StormsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Brisbane Storms============================================
Thanks, talk soon, my Flickr; http://www.flickr.com/photos/kanegledhill/
Re: Brisbane StormsKane that is just beautiful !!!
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
Re: Brisbane StormsNIce image..Moody and well captured
MATT
Re: Brisbane Stormswow, that is incredible, i love the whole composition with the tree sillouette off to the right, amazing. Well done.
2 x Fuji xt1,vg-xt1 grip, Fujinon xf 18-55mm 2.8-4, Fujinon xf 14mm, Fujinon 56mm 1.2.
Re: Brisbane StormsThe famous tree again! This is my favourite image of this for sure. Well done.
D90 + 18-55VR + 55-200VR
Re: Brisbane StormsGreat image. Your were lucky !! to get the lightning fill the image perfectly. Wonderful effort.
Re: Brisbane StormsDo you have any (or could you redo your PP) with less exposure in the centre of the image? I'd like to see this darker, with greater contrast around the lightning.
g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Brisbane StormsWhile a great image, there is some more detail in the middle that some extra pp could bring it and make it even better.
I always like these shoots with something extra in the scene and not just a bolt or 2. Nice work and wish I was there D4, D700, plus glass from 14mm to 200mm
Gaffa Tape is like the FORCE... it has a Light side, a Dark side and it holds the universe together
Re: Brisbane StormsIs this your famous photogenic tree? Great shot and I agree with the others about the more detail in the middle and also more contrast for the tree silhoutte.
Re: Brisbane StormsThanks guys, this shot made #10 on explore.
I might have another play in PP and see if I can get more out of it, thanks for feedback/comments. Yes this is the famous tree ! I now have Moon rise, Sunset, Sunrise, Stars and storms..... hmmmm what next? ============================================
Thanks, talk soon, my Flickr; http://www.flickr.com/photos/kanegledhill/
Re: Brisbane Storms============================================
Thanks, talk soon, my Flickr; http://www.flickr.com/photos/kanegledhill/
Re: Brisbane StormsThe exposure in the center looks better on your 2nd image, but you've lost some of the tree, which was fantastic in the first image. A more selective adjustment of the overexposed lightning bolt is what you're looking for.
If you can't work that out, I'd leave it as is (the first post)... Good work! GB Nikon D300, Nikkor 28-70mm f/ 2.8, 80-200mm f/2.8 Tokina 12-24mm
Nikon Coolpix 5700
Re: Brisbane StormsAs Gripboy suggests, you have now lost contrast/detail in the tree.
Basically, you now need to combine what you have from the first image wrt the tree and edges, with what you have in the centre from the second version. We are a picky bunch, aren't we? g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Brisbane StormsIsn't it the Brisbane Broncos?
I thought the Storms were from Melbourne! TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Re: Brisbane StormsWhat a good shot. I had heard there was a good storm up in B-Vegas this week - glad someone posted some (well at least one) shots.
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Re: Brisbane StormsNice work!
I was up in the hills for that one so we got the development but not the light show afterwards... It was quite an amazing event... Perhaps a mixed exposure (HDR from the same pic using a mask, quite a bit of work though...)? New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|