Increasingly my wife has been frustrated by the exposure results she has been getting. The lens she used in these examples is the Nikon 17-35 f2.8
My results are sometimes similar - in these examples I am using my D200 and the Nikon 24-70 f2.8 - expensive glass.
Exif info in the images is intact.
Take this shot for example, from her camera.
This is typical for what she gets when shooting anywhere near a light source.
A similar shot from my camera -
Definitely more light getting into her photo.
Now, another example from my camera.
At normal exposure -
at -2
at -1
at +1
Then with her camera and the 17-35, at exposure bias 0 -
At -1
At -2
Another example from her camera - at bias 0
At bias -1
It is possible for her camera to take reasonable exposure photos -
Here are 3 more, at exposure 0, -.33 and -.66
Now I'm sorry about all these images in this post, but does anyone have any suggestions as to WTF is going on and what we can do to end up with correctly exposed images without having so much washout?
We'd really appreciate some help with this.
It does appear to me that the combination of her camera and the 17-35 does seem to create, ordinarily, an over-exposed image.
I should really try swapping bodies / lenses, also try the Nikon 12-24 glass and see if I can narrow the problem down to whether it is glass, her D200, or just technique.
Hers has a later firmware in it compared to mine - hers is capable of recognizing a WR-3 wnereas mine doesn't have that in the menu. I'm reluctant to flash mine in case it introduces similar exposure quirks.
If it's us, and we need to learn something - great - at least we now have a starting point. Any ideas?