Backyard macros

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Backyard macros

Postby ATJ on Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:45 pm

Some shots from the backyard, today.

All shot with D300, 60mm f/2.8D, PK-13, SB-800, DIY small softbox, monopod. All are uncropped. All taken on the same small tree.

Image
Mantis, probably Orthodera ministralis.

Image
Katydid nymph, possibly Torbia viridissima.

Image
Yellow-headed leafhopper nymph, Brunotartessus fulvus.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Re: Backyard macros

Postby big pix on Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:22 am

AJ ...... don't go outside as that last beast has his eye on you and looks dangerous ........... another fine set of macros
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Re: Backyard macros

Postby Oneputt on Sat Oct 25, 2008 11:32 am

Nice macros but what is that insect in the last? :shock:
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Re: Backyard macros

Postby chrisk on Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:54 pm

love the last one. cool little critter.
have you ever tried kenko tubes ? wondering why you paid the premium for the PK-13.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Re: Backyard macros

Postby ATJ on Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:49 pm

Oneputt wrote:Nice macros but what is that insect in the last? :shock:

It is the nymph of a Yellow-headed leafhopper, Brunotartessus fulvus.

The adult looks like this:
Image

Leafhoppers are related to cicadas and the adult does have a cicada look about it. The nymphs are the stages before adult, in between each moult. On the last moult, the adult emerges with wings.

Rooz wrote:have you ever tried kenko tubes ? wondering why you paid the premium for the PK-13.

I haven't tried them. I don't believe they existed when I bought the PK-13 back in 1993.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Re: Backyard macros

Postby DebT on Wed Oct 29, 2008 6:39 am

Interesting - I'm a bit of a bug fan myself ..
I really like to see the eyes so for me #1 seems a little soft. Love #2 - sharp as and nicely fills the frame with great legs. I'd like to see more of the bug detail in #3 so maybe a tighter crop . Nice use of light - can I ask DOF used ?
Great variety of bugs - I'm stuck with wooly aphids eating my roses at the moment so youv'e encouraged me to take an post a few shots.
Deb T
DebT
"so many dreams - so little time "
User avatar
DebT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 812
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:58 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: Backyard macros

Postby ATJ on Wed Oct 29, 2008 7:30 am

DebT wrote:I'd like to see more of the bug detail in #3 so maybe a tighter crop .

Here you go:

Image

As the nymph is so small, the only way to get it larger in the frame (without buying a longer tube) is to crop it. This guy is only 3-4mm long. The width covered by the whole frame is only 15mm (RR=1.6:1).


DebT wrote:Nice use of light - can I ask DOF used ?

You can ask. :P I'm not sure how I can answer on the specific DOF. I can tell you the lens was manually set on f/16 (the tube is manual and designed for AI lenses). To that there are two things to be considered to determine the effective f/stop: 1) extension caused by focusing the lens to its closest distance: 2) extension from the tube itself.

For the 1st one, with the lens mounted directly on the camera, f/32 becomes f/57 at full extension, which is about 1.5 stops, so the lens was effectively f/29. I'm not sure how much effect the tube (27.5mm) has on the f/stop, but I'm guessing at least half a stop. At a guess, I'd say the effective f/stop was between f/32 and f/45.

How this translates to DOF is anyone's guess.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Re: Backyard macros

Postby Mr Darcy on Wed Oct 29, 2008 8:16 am

ATJ wrote:How this translates to DOF is anyone's guess.

I'll have a go...
the foremost foot on the nymph is just losing focus, as is the tail. Now you say the insect is 3-4mm long, but the tail is curled up (Not sure if length is counted using this pose, or stretched out) so DOF~= 3mm (+1 -0.5mm)
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains

Re: Backyard macros

Postby DebT on Wed Oct 29, 2008 8:56 pm

Andrew -
thanks for the blow up ..facinating little thing you sure have interesting bugs ..and now I know the size i can see why full frame was a huge job
The detail of you explination was appreciated and took quite some time to digest but (apart from learning I should ask the question differently next time ie what fstop) I think I understand and got the info I was after ...

Mr Darcy - thanks for the simple english translation

Think I am looking for the secret receipe for setting the correct fstop to get full subject focus with macro ...I don't seem to be getting the DOF preview working with macro particularily well ..is that to be expected or do I need to re-read the manual
Using 40D with Canon 100m 2.8 macro and X25 extension tube

DebT
DebT
"so many dreams - so little time "
User avatar
DebT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 812
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:58 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: Backyard macros

Postby Mr Darcy on Wed Oct 29, 2008 10:22 pm

DebT wrote:Mr Darcy - thanks for the simple english translation

Damn I must be slipping :lol: :P
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques