CroakerModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
CroakerA closeup shot I took in the wild of the common South Australian froglet Ranidella signifera. A quiet, gradual approach was all that was needed, the success often depends on just how keen they are to breed. Nikon D50, Kiron 105mm f2.8 1:1, Metz 45CT4
Mark Newton
Adelaide, Australia
Re: CroakerNice detail on the throat and head. I think I'd rather see it rotated 90º clockwise. Is the white balance right? The whole shot looks a bit red.
Also, isn't it Crinia, or have those pesky taxonomists been at it again?
Re: Croaker
Yep....Ranidella was created quite a few years ago....may well be too red, I dont overly fuss with colour, everyone has a different monitor and colour is a reflection of light temperature, so is highly variable. If it goes to print, I leave that up to the printers.... I can tell you I was in an extremely contorted position when I toook that shot, framing was quite difficult. Mark Newton
Adelaide, Australia
Re: CroakerRel may have some other information, but it does appear that Crinia Tschudi 1838 is the valid genus and Ranidella Girard 1853 is an invalid synonym. See: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/references.php?id=18611
Re: CroakerYep definitely Crinia - Nice shot - I can imagine the contortions you must have been in - it's a bloody small frog, so you did really well !!!!
Sorry it took so long for me to reply - I kept getting bumped off the site when I tried to reply, so hopefully this goes through Hugs Rel Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|