Portrait shoot pics

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Portrait shoot pics

Postby timno1 on Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:47 pm

I have just started taking up portrait photography after years of mainly shooting sports.Here are a few pics from a recent shoot....any critique is most welcome.
Image
Image
timno1
Newbie
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:28 pm
Location: Parramatta

Re: Portrait shoot pics

Postby aim54x on Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:55 pm

The background in #1 is a little distracting and the pose does not work for me (I guess it is a pretty standard pose), I like #2 much better but (it could be this laptop screen) her skin looks a little over exposed.

Great effort though, keep them coming!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Portrait shoot pics

Postby TonyT on Wed Nov 19, 2008 5:30 pm

I like no 2 as well seem more relaxed and has warm feel to it, my screen shows the skin over exposed too.
I do not dislike no 1 it just seem to be lacking and also don't like the hair across the face.
I took some shots which had hair across the face didn't see it at the time so photoshop them out which takes time.
But still good shots through
User avatar
TonyT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 854
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:08 am
Location: Narrabundah Canberra ACT

Re: Portrait shoot pics

Postby timno1 on Wed Nov 19, 2008 5:59 pm

I take the point about the skin tones maybe a bit overexposed in the second pic.Im still learning to use photoshop properly and i was trying the skin smoothing technique,but i guess i might have gone a bit too far.
timno1
Newbie
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:28 pm
Location: Parramatta

Re: Portrait shoot pics

Postby timno1 on Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:53 pm

Here is another shot from the same shoot
Image
timno1
Newbie
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:28 pm
Location: Parramatta

Re: Portrait shoot pics

Postby gstark on Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:21 pm

These all look a tad too yellow to me. She looks like she has jaundice. Check the yellows of her eyes (formerly known as "the whites") and her teeth are somewhat reminiscent of an aging pianola. Is there such a thing as a pianola that is not aging? :) What were your in-camera wb settings, please?

In the first image, the pose looks forced and uncomfortable: it looks as if she is leaning backwards for the photo, and almost falling out of it.

Your lighting in these images is nice and soft and diffuse. Were you just using the open shade, or did you use some modifiers?
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Portrait shoot pics

Postby mickeyjuice on Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:54 pm

I'm with Gary, the first thing I noticed was the WB, and it reduced the attraction of the photos in a major way.
cheers, juice
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mickeyjuice/
A bunch of Canon stuff (including Canon & Sigma lenses). Way more gear than talent.
User avatar
mickeyjuice
Member
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 12:48 am
Location: West Brunswick, Victoria

Re: Portrait shoot pics

Postby aim54x on Wed Nov 19, 2008 8:00 pm

Just looking again at home, I have to agree, she does look a little yellow, and skin in #2 is still looking a little over exposed.

:agree: with Gary, the lighting is really nice, diffuse and soft. :up:
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Portrait shoot pics

Postby surenj on Wed Nov 19, 2008 8:18 pm

I am no expert on skin tones but adding +27 on the blue slider in photoshop colourbalance made a world of difference.
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Portrait shoot pics

Postby gstark on Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:22 pm

surenj wrote:I am no expert on skin tones but adding +27 on the blue slider in photoshop colourbalance made a world of difference.



That might appear to address the problem, but if the issue is wb, then it might not be the best way to deal with this.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Portrait shoot pics

Postby surenj on Sat Nov 22, 2008 4:25 am

gstark wrote:
surenj wrote:I am no expert on skin tones but adding +27 on the blue slider in photoshop colourbalance made a world of difference.



That might appear to address the problem, but if the issue is wb, then it might not be the best way to deal with this.


Gary, Are you suggesting changing the WB on raw conversion? What is the difference between the two approaches?
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Portrait shoot pics

Postby gstark on Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:35 am

surenj wrote:
gstark wrote:
surenj wrote:I am no expert on skin tones but adding +27 on the blue slider in photoshop colourbalance made a world of difference.



That might appear to address the problem, but if the issue is wb, then it might not be the best way to deal with this.


Gary, Are you suggesting changing the WB on raw conversion? What is the difference between the two approaches?


Yes I am. Certainly, if the raw is available, that would be the first avenue I would explore. You need to, really, address the problem, rather than the symptoms.

There's a couple of points to observe here. First of all, by adjusting the raw, you're addressing any problems at about the closest possible level to the source image. That means that everything that's derived from that is affected, which means that everything that's derived from it is also adjusted. :)

But in adjusting the blue, as you have done, you are only just adjusting the one colour channel. That will have a minor affect on some of the other colours in the image, where there is an element of blue/yellow in those other colours. But if there is not, then those colours may not be affected by your changes.

That might sound ok, until you understand that if the issue is one of wb, then we're actually talking about an issue in the way that the light illuminating the whole of the image has been recorded and rendered. If we're not correctly accounting for the light, then all of the colours will be likely to be so affected. In those circumstances, selectively correcting just some of the elements will actually distort the colour relationships within the image, and may make subsequent adjustments even more difficult.

So, and as always ;), it's a matter of getting back to basics and trying to identify what the actual problem is, and then correcting that. If the problem is merely wb, getting that fixed will bring everything else back into line, and make any other colour adjustments that much easier.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Portrait shoot pics

Postby surenj on Sat Nov 22, 2008 3:10 pm

Thanks Gary, that makes sense..
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Portrait shoot pics

Postby timno1 on Mon Nov 24, 2008 7:56 am

When i was doing this shoot,i had the WB setting on the camera on the "shade" setting,but i also adjusted the WB a little in photoshop on the RAW image.A reason why the skin tones may be a little yellow;that first shot had a slight red cast over it so i adjusted the red in "colour balance" on photoshop,but i obviously shouldve adjusted the yellow also.
timno1
Newbie
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:28 pm
Location: Parramatta

Re: Portrait shoot pics

Postby shutterbug on Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:57 pm

So, and as always ;), it's a matter of getting back to basics and trying to identify what the actual problem is, and then correcting that. If the problem is merely wb, getting that fixed will bring everything else back into line, and make any other colour adjustments that much easier.


Agree with this :D

Firstly is your monitor calibrated ?

I just played with the 3rd image in ps, I just used auto colour on a different layer & played with amount and then adjust curves.......hope you don't mind...

Image

vince
User avatar
shutterbug
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown

Re: Portrait shoot pics

Postby Matt. K on Tue Nov 25, 2008 6:32 pm

This will be a difficult image to correctly colour balance and after a number of quick attempts I found that IMAGE/HUE-SATURATION-YELLOW CHANNEL and reduce the saturation of the yellow works reasonably well. The image could also do with a little curves adjustment to brighten the mid-tones. If it all gets too difficult then an elegant way out is to convert the image to black & white. :D :D :D
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Re: Portrait shoot pics

Postby devilla101 on Tue Nov 25, 2008 6:37 pm

Not a bad first try into portraiture. I agree with what most people say regarding the white balance and posing issue.

Don't be too concerned. You did well. Everything is in focus and lighting is spot on. Just keep shooting, reviewing, researching and shoot again. You can only improve.
User avatar
devilla101
Senior Member
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Rockdale, Sydney, Australia


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques