Not much to say about thisModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Not much to say about thisWhich is why it's up here for you guys to talk about.
Re: Not much to say about thisI like the lighting and mood. a larger photo would be better to have a look at detail. What was your lighting set up?
Re: Not much to say about thishttp://www.flickr.com/photos/dtang/3009 ... 736392577/
Bigger picture here. One direct sb-800 on a monopod held off camera left, and one shoot through on camera right. Both on manual, I think it was like 1/250 @ f/8.
Re: Not much to say about thisDid you try the shoot through as the key light and the bare flash as a hair/background light? Might produce a different look.
Re: Not much to say about thisYes I did, and they were pretty standard. It was when i decided to reverse the two lights I got that, and it seemed to be a much more interesting photo.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|