uglyModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
uglychurch at Maryvale sure is an ugly looking building ...
Shane
Life's too short to be sad ! http://bigred4x4.blogspot.com/2008/01/welcome.html http://bigred.redbubble.com
Re: uglyyeah but the pretty purple flowers make it all good
maybe a portrait shot to capture those sweeping clouds and more flowers might have been an option gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: uglyI like it, its very well composed and my eye was being drawn to the building which is the topic if Im not mistaken......good job....cheers
Photoaction Australia http://www.photoaction.com.au sports action interest e-zine
photoaction@mac.com
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|