Random 50mm f1.4G shots

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Random 50mm f1.4G shots

Postby chrisk on Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:10 pm

this lens is starting to startle me a little here. the sharpness and contrast at f2 is remarkable. can one become infatuated with a lens ? hmmmm....not so sure this is a healthy relationship. all with sb400.

f2.8, iso1250...dayum !
Image

Image

Image

Image
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Re: Random 50mm f1.4G shots

Postby gstark on Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:13 pm

But it's lobotomised!

But yes, you're seeing in this what I saw the other day when we had a play with one on the D3X. Very bloody nice.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Random 50mm f1.4G shots

Postby aim54x on Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:32 pm

Rooz, you had the 1.4D how much difference is there between the lenses optically have you noticed?

Great results, and I dont think it is an unhealthy relationship between the 50 1.4 and the SB-400
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Random 50mm f1.4G shots

Postby Geoff on Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:42 pm

Delightful images Chris.
Mind me asking if you were shooting with the SB400 then why bump the ISO up so high, with an aperture of 2.8?
They are all great, but I think the 2nd image in this series is the standout. I'd like to see just a tad more contrast in the last shot. Show us some more!!
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Re: Random 50mm f1.4G shots

Postby chrisk on Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:50 pm

bokeh is quite obviously much better. top right corner of #2 is a perfect example of that. its definately more contrasty, but as i said befre, i think thats a result of the hood more than anything else.

sharpness i thought was close but the more and more i shoot with it the more and more i'm thinking the differences are more significant than what i first thought. at apertures from f2-f4 which is where i shoot this lens it just "seems" noticeabley sharper. but i think that may be my excitement talking. lol

one thing is for sure though, its ability to track and nail focus is fantastic. in fact i'm sure thats why i'm getting sharper shots, cos its nailing focus so frequently.

buggered if i know mate, i'm just enjoying it !
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Re: Random 50mm f1.4G shots

Postby chrisk on Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:55 pm

Geoff wrote:Delightful images Chris.
Mind me asking if you were shooting with the SB400 then why bump the ISO up so high, with an aperture of 2.8?
They are all great, but I think the 2nd image in this series is the standout. I'd like to see just a tad more contrast in the last shot. Show us some more!!


if you're asking is why didnt i shoot it at 1.4, its cos i needed some wiggle room on dof cos he moves so damn fast.
if what you;'re asking is why do i have the iso so high given the settings, it;s to balance the light and avoid the "deer in the headlights" flash look.

theres prob a fair bit of PP that can be done with these to improve them alot but...
a) i'm lazy
b) these are SOOC
c) refer to (a)

lol
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Re: Random 50mm f1.4G shots

Postby Reschsmooth on Tue Dec 16, 2008 9:06 pm

If the improvements on the 50 1.4 are this good, imagine how the 85 1.4 AFS will be! It would just be nice if they kept the bloody aperture ring on them.

Great shots, Rooz.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques