Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
23 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2These were taken a bit later on in the evening, again at Whale Beach.
Off camera flash was used (thanks Wocka for being a great assistant): Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2First up, congratulations Belinda and Geoff (sorry I could not be there on the day).
#1 - Sea is not straight. Lighting too harsh. Closer with WA lens would have given more impact. #2 - See #1 #3 - See #1 #4 - Lighting is far too harsh and too directional #5 - Sea still not straight but the best of the five shots as the subject fills the frame more Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2 In both these and the last set, one or two "artistic" shots with the horizon off looks good, but across these two series it looks like the photog was on a lean all day. As a set I think this starts to detract from some otherwise excellent shots.
Ant. D90 | D50 | Tamron 17-50 2.8| AF-S 18-55 DX (and VR) | Sigma 70 - 300 APO DG | 50mm 1.8 | SB-600
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2agree about the horizons, needs a little straightening. otherwise i will have to disagree with chris here for a change. i think the lighting is superb. i think its supposed to be vivid and contrasty so the lighting suits what i think the mood actually is.
the only slight issue i have with #1 is the pose. looks like she's pulling away and you're chasing here down. now, that may be the case in real life but i think the pose in #2 is sensational. great set. EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2#4 and #5 are my favourites but that horizon in #5 does have to be straightened and the directional light in #4 could be softened up a little.
Looks like you were in capable hands though. Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2Love the colour and drama of the first few....Wow! You guys look great - Bel is beautiful!
Cheers,
macka a.k.a. Kris
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2Geoff, I think Grant has really done wonders with the amazing sunset that you had that afternoon. I really like the use of flash in these, sure, slightly softer light would have been nice, but, to me, that is only a small niggle in otherwise fantastic shots (yeah, I do agree with previous comments about the horizon).
Also, it would have looked better if you had a great big Mo!!! Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2These are brilliant! I didn't even notice the horizon issue until it was pointed out. Great use of off camera flash. I would be chuffed have these as my wedding photos.
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2Fantastic photos. Congratulations to you and Belinda!
Alex
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2Geoff very impressive and you will have some great memories. PS Who was the company which took them?
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2#1 and #2 are absolutely stunning
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2I love the lighting but I have to agree with some of the comments here in relation to the horizon not being straight.
Thanks for sharing. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
whoALSE => Allen One form of time travel is thru Captured Moments
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2Excellent images Geoff at the right time of day for such things. (I shot a wedding a few weeks back at midday and it was a headache at times with the glare).
As for the second, your missus must be very flexible... Ozi President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2Wow, I love the strong orange color you capture on that shoot. Great lighting and composition!
Did you underexpose for the sky to get those saturated colors or in PP?
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2Thanks Devilla - the light was indeed amazing!
I'm not sure what our photog did for the sky, but I think there has been a moderate amount of PP on these, that said we are still very happy with them and I don't think he's pushed them too far. Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2No doubt dude, the photos are amazing!
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2Great images - they have an immediate impact, and I'm sure will still evoke great memories in years to come. Are you going to have a go at the current TTD (Trash The Dress) fad?
Canon 7D | Canon 350D | G5 | S95 | 24-70mm f2.8L | 50mm f1.8 II | 70-200mm f2.8L USM | 430EX II | Strobist gear
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2
Absolutely not Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2
Geoff looks bad enough in a dry dress, let alone a wet, white one! Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2Hey Geoff - congratulations - your photos look fantastic and you guys look really good together
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2
Hey Geoff you're married now, aren't these things "joint" decisions now?? Canon 7D | Canon 350D | G5 | S95 | 24-70mm f2.8L | 50mm f1.8 II | 70-200mm f2.8L USM | 430EX II | Strobist gear
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2
Bel doesn't want to see him in a dress either. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Our wedding - the pro shots Part 2
Since when have the terms "married" and "joint decisions" ever existed in the same sentenc without being qualified by the phrase "never again"? Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Previous topic • Next topic
23 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|