The PartyModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: The PartyWhist it's nice to see some experimentation in photography, I find these images too dark to provide any meaningful message.
You were obviously seeking a special effect, but a touch more light on the subjects would be helpful IMO. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Re: The PartyI shot it with natural light. As to meaning, that's up to the viewer, but I like the sense of loneliness one gets from them. The first one in particular is a fav, it highlights that idea of a party with no one there and those that are there are disembodied. A mate of mine said it looked more like a funeral than a party. I guess that's the point. Sometimes people don't always feel happy or fit in at parties.
Re: The PartyFair enough.
But look at photo #1 without the information you have just conveyed. What does it say to the viewer as a stand-alone work? Is there a theme or a message that is obvious to the viewer? I don't think so, but maybe that's just me. I'm not trying to be negative. On the contrary, I like the experimentation. I am just providing constructive criticism, and I am only a single viewer. Others may think differently. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Re: The PartyI agree with Trevor, here. The first image doesn't say a lot on its own. If the explanation is needed then it is missing something.
The second image has more meaning, but without the title, it could mean a lot of things. Sympathy. A heartfelt farewell.
Re: The PartyI tend to agree with some of the previous comments. Love the experimentation but I just don't find that it works for me.
I wonder if the fact that you were on location means you have attached memories etc that aren't apparent in the images themselves? Cheers 5DmII + some L lenses
http://imagepro.photography.com/mitchell
Re: The Party#1 has an eerrie feel to it, but I agree with the others that it would be a supporting photo a series. But it's not strong on it's own though. Unusual viewpoint of a birthday party though.
Re: The Party
Thats the thing though, it is the begining of a series. I didn't know I was going to go down that path till I shot the images. Now it has become a project.
Re: The Party
That's interesting point. I usually don't, but it might be the case.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|