Sisters....Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Sisters........and of course my daughters. Not sure if I prefer the B&W or the colour version. The hair across the face of the eldest (on left) is a bit annoying and I have tried to clone out without success, so left as is. C&C appreciated.
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11
http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com http://xtographer.weebly.com
Re: Sisters....I like the B&W conversion Geoff it just has more appeal for me
Cheers Rod
Re: Sisters....Hmmm..I like both versions but I'm teetering on the colour...why?
I think the B&W/conversion makes this look like a reaaaaaaaaaaaaaly old style/fashioned photograph..now that's not necessarily a bad thing, just how I see it. I think sepia would do this even more. Alas, and none-the-less...great image, well done Geoff (with the same spelling..legend!) A bit of patience and time and I think you could successfully get rid of the hair, if you are keen on this Geoff, I know a specialist in the field and could have it done for you in the blink (well nearly) of an eye...just say the word. I gave it a go, but I've had one too many beverages this lovely summer's evening and well...*hic*. Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Re: Sisters....I really like the B&W version Geoff. looks great.
Personally, I wouldn't worry about the hair, adds to the charm. I do like Geoff's suggestion of Sepia too, would be worth a crack (and if you have Lightroom 2, there are some excellent presets which would be worth a try) Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
Re: Sisters....Geoff
The B&W version..........I love it! It looks like a Dianne Arbus masterpiece in its tonality and composition. Great job! The hair across the face takes nothing away from the image and should be left there IMO. Regards
Matt. K
Re: Sisters....Hi Guys
Thanks for the feedback, I still like both but with a leaning toward the B&W. The wife prefers the colour and therefore I have printed the colour version, but as a 10" square crop to suit a frame I already had. I also tried a sepia version (using LR2), but was not keen on the outcome, I do prefer my B&W's to be just that - B&W. Matt - I confess to not knowing of Diane Arbus, but have since googled her work, which I like and agree that my picture does emulate some of her work. Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11
http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com http://xtographer.weebly.com
Re: Sisters....I love them both but the color version needs the background color to be adjusted so it's not beige color...
Wonderful capture!
Re: Sisters....Without looking at the 2nd photo, I thought it was a scanned and digitally enhanced 1940's photo.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|