Incy Wincy Spider....NotModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
25 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Incy Wincy Spider....NotAt my computer the other night typing away when this bloke ran into my room, over my foot and decided my bed would be the perfect place for a time-out
What is with these huge spiders and my room? Large Huntsman’s seem to make a B-line straight for it, it's like directions to my place are written all over toilet walls in every spider nightclub on the planet.... This particular one was 15cm toe to toe.... (and not the largest I've chased from my room) Here's the shots, enjoy...if thats the right word Brown Huntsman (Heteropoda jugulans)
First one I saw,.. not bad.. I scrolled down..
Woooooha, super upclose and personal man.. very in your face their.. what lens were you using ?
I was using the raynox 250 macro lens on the end of my FZ-50 It's not to bad a lens but depth of field is a killer, might try some B+W close-up filters for when I don't need to get so close.
Sweet. Better than the real thing
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
oh jesus oh jesus! how u keep it still? it was dead? u killed it?
Canon EOS 40D
Canon EOS 400D 50mm 1.8 EF
Hehe... chased it around the room with a feather duster....long handled one of course.... captured it, and stuck it in the freezer for 5 mins... took a few snaps the release it unharmed.
The second shot is fantastic. So much detail.
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
U Farkin mad!!! kill that freakin thing!!! massive..... Canon EOS 40D
Canon EOS 400D 50mm 1.8 EF
anyone using a nikon 105mm micro?hi mr bugeyes. just have question re raynox filters? i searched the forum and your macro shots came out. your bug closeups are magnificent. ive been wanting to achieve the same (as most enthusiast do) so i bought a nikon 105mm micro vr. i thought this lens alone could the job as the raynox does. i saw different samples in other forum and they are just using a 50mm prime lens paired w raynox. and some are dprosumer cams just like you do. do you think my nikon micro lens is such a waste? or will it have advantage (if raynox is attached) over normal lenses w the same filter?
other input is appreciated i hope you understand my english
Re: Incy Wincy Spider....NotHi Rex and thanks, the Raynox is OK, but has problems too, focus is difficult, and depth of field is very small. While you can use one with SLR lenses, it is designed for point and shoot cameras, there are other options for dSLR-users ...Like extension tubes...
http://www.tincheungcamera.com.hk/advan ... cription=0 These tubes attach between your lens and camera to help you focus at closer distances, which will increase the lenses effective magnification, I think this would be your best option? Maybe some of our Nikon users can chime in with suggestions, as I'm not too familiar with modern Nikon equipment. But remember equipment is only as good as the person using it, macro photography can be a difficult to achieve satisfactory results, Photography is 50% photographer, 40% light and 10% equipment... P.S. Your English is 1,000 times better than my Cantonese Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I have my doubts about the former.
....Albert Einstein
Re: Incy Wincy Spider....NotI'm in love with the second shot - gorgeous
Glad to hear the spider was unharmed - Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
Re: Incy Wincy Spider....NotExtension tubes are one of the best ways to increase magnification. Kenko make an inexpensive set for Nikon (as well as Canon) and they are very effective. See: Kenko Extension Tubes
Re: Incy Wincy Spider....NotFantastic shots Bugeyes. I was really impressed with the sharpness and exposure on the bit I saw - until I ran screaming from the room.
Now I'm only new here but can I respectfully suggest that these kinds of shots be labeled NSFW also (not safe for wooses)! Great work. I'm just trying to broaden my horizons and a set of Kenko's has now been added to my wishlist. Cheers, Muzz Canon 7D | Canon 350D | G5 | S95 | 24-70mm f2.8L | 50mm f1.8 II | 70-200mm f2.8L USM | 430EX II | Strobist gear
Re: Incy Wincy Spider....NotRex
The Nikkor 105mm macro lens is a magnificent lens...one of the best on the market. If you still need to get closer then, as advised by others on this thread, buy a set of extension tubes and mate them up with your macro lens. This will get you into the eye of the needle type shots without giving away any lens quality. On the downside you will only be able to work in manual mode....but this is no problem after a little practice. Regards
Matt. K
Re: Incy Wincy Spider....NotYour forum name of Bugeyes seems especially appropriate for these shots, particularly #2 and #3!
Anyway, great shots, extremely well done. You have nailed the focus. And Rez - you have a top lens there, I have the older (non VR) Nikkor 105 and it is a cracker. You can do some magical macro stuff with that, don't worry! Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
Re: Incy Wincy Spider....NotMatt, the Kenko tubes support both CPU linkage and auto focus. Auto focus works fine with my Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2.8D lens. According to the Kenko site, you are not meant to get AF with AF-S lenses, but it seems to work with my AF-S 18--55mm.
Note that I don't actually use AF for my macro shots, but I use the AF-ON button to adjust the focus with my right hand to keep my left hand free for holding perches, etc.
Re: Incy Wincy Spider....NotCan you use the extension tubes with the 105VR lens? Not having an aperture ring I would have thought it wouldn't work?
Re: Incy Wincy Spider....Not
You can use the Kenko tubes as they have CPU linkage.
Re: Incy Wincy Spider....NotI'll confirm Andrew's opinion. I have used the Kenko tubes with the 105VR. No problem except that you almost need the subject inside the lens if you use all three at once. Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
Re: Incy Wincy Spider....NotGreat idea to put her into the freezer - where did you get that? And how do you know that no little spiders come crawling out of your veggies in a few days? Just kidding - great shots, my fav is #2!
Cheers,
Trevor
Re: Incy Wincy Spider....Not@ blacknstormy, ATJ, matt k, greg B, tommyg, mr darcy, trevor and bugeyes thank you so much guys. your input is such a big help to everybody.
Re: Incy Wincy Spider....NotI did a quick test with the tubes and the 105VR.
Results are at http://www.dslrusers.com/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=35215&p=379755#p379755
I was wrong on this. It just seems that way . Closest focussing is 120mm (five inches to those metric challenged readers) to front of lens Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
Previous topic • Next topic
25 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|